We have following issue, if we execute a commit:
java.lang.StackOverflowError at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:411) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:499) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:417) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:499) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:499) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:417) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:499) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:499) at com.objectdb.o.ENT.D(ENT.java:417)
What version of ObjectDB are you using?
If you can provide a full stack trace (possibly from the log file) it could help.
Please recheck the version number (on the client side), since it does not match the stack trace.
In addition, this is only a partial stack trace. Please find the full stack trace in the ObjectDB (client side) log file.
we have solved this issue, some of our Entity classes were annotated with @Embeddable instead of @Entity
the objectdb error log had following stacktrace, it is possible to throw a better exception?
com.objectdb.o.UserException: Failed to write the value of field field com.btc.ep.architecture.virtualcomposed.bl.internal.dmos.VirtualChildInterfaceImpl.architecture using reflection - field com.btc.ep.architecture.virtualcomposed.bl.internal.dmos.VirtualChildArchitectureImpl.virtualInterfaces - field com.btc.ep.architecture.virtualcomposed.bl.internal.dmos.VirtualChildInterfaceImpl.architecture - field com.btc.ep.architecture.virtualcomposed.bl.internal.dmos.VirtualChildArchitectureImpl.virtualInterfaces - field .... com.btc.ep.architecture.virtualcomposed.bl.internal.dmos.VirtualChildArchitectureImpl.virtualInterfaces - field com.btc.ep.architecture.virtualcomposed.bl.internal.dmos.VirtualComposedArchitectureImpl.childArchitectures at com.objectdb.o.MSG.d(MSG.java:75) at com.objectdb.o.UMR.P(UMR.java:934) at com.objectdb.o.UMR.z(UMR.java:574) at com.objectdb.o.UML.u(UML.java:537) at com.objectdb.o.MMM.aj(MMM.java:1149) at com.objectdb.o.UTY.writeStrictly(UTY.java:1377) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ap(TYW.java:432) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.writeElement(TYW.java:301) at com.objectdb.o.ABT.writeArray(ABT.java:575) at com.objectdb.o.CLT.writeStrictly(CLT.java:195) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ap(TYW.java:432) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ar(TYW.java:482) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.writeElement(TYW.java:309) at com.objectdb.o.UMR$S.A(UMR.java:1001) at com.objectdb.o.UMR.z(UMR.java:571) at com.objectdb.o.UML.u(UML.java:537) at com.objectdb.o.MMM.aj(MMM.java:1149) at com.objectdb.o.UTY.writeStrictly(UTY.java:1377) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ap(TYW.java:432) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.writeElement(TYW.java:301) at com.objectdb.o.UMR$S.A(UMR.java:1001) at com.objectdb.o.UMR.z(UMR.java:571) at com.objectdb.o.UML.u(UML.java:537) at com.objectdb.o.MMM.aj(MMM.java:1149) at com.objectdb.o.UTY.writeStrictly(UTY.java:1377) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ap(TYW.java:432) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.writeElement(TYW.java:301) at com.objectdb.o.ABT.writeArray(ABT.java:575) at com.objectdb.o.CLT.writeStrictly(CLT.java:195) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ap(TYW.java:432) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.ar(TYW.java:482) at com.objectdb.o.TYW.writeElement(TYW.java:309)
Thank you for the update. We will check how a better error message can be produced.
