About FetchType
Retrieving JPA Entity Objects
Explains how to use JPA to retrieve entity objects from the database.... fetched. See JavaDoc Reference Page... = FetchType javax.persistence.FetchType JPA enum Defines strategies for fetching data from the ...
javax.persistence.FetchType
Defines strategies for fetching data from the database.(Enum of JPA)
JPA Annotations for Relationships
Reference (JavaDoc) of JPA 2 relationship annotations, including @ManyToMany, @ManyToOne, @OneToMany, @OneToOne, @OrderBy and @MapKey.... javax.persistence.CascadeType javax.persistence.FetchType Additional annotations are supported by ObjectDB for ...
New entity objects are duplicated on merge cascading
When merge is cascaded to a new entity object that has not been persisted yet - it becomes persisted twice. This was demonstrated by a Java EE application in this forum thread but may be reproduced also in a simple console test case: ... = CascadeType . ALL , fetch = FetchType . EAGER ) private List<Chapter> ... @ OneToOne ( fetch = FetchType . LAZY , cascade = CascadeType . ALL ) ...
Problem with @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
I have a class where two fields are annotated with @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) due to them containing quite long Strings and me loading ALL entities of the database on application startup (swing app) This class should hopefully demonstrate the problem: ... where two fields are annotated with @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) due to them containing quite long Strings and me loading ALL ... ; @ Basic ( fetch = FetchType . LAZY ) private String description ; @ ...
find() cost unreasonable time!
Hi, I make a full binary tree of 4095 node, I check the first 9 node, but the root cost 24 seconds, why? Result: ... ( mappedBy = "parent" , fetch = FetchType . EAGER ) protected List<Nodes> Sons ; ... . Entity ; import javax. persistence . FetchType ; import javax. persistence . GeneratedValue ; ...
values()
Returns an array containing the constants of this enum type.(Static Method of javax.persistence.FetchType)
Should derived fields of an EmbeddedId be manually maintained by app code?
If I have an Entity which has a primary key which is derived and I am implementing it using @EmbeddedId, am I responsible for maintaining the derived fields of the @EmbeddedId? I could not find anything in the JPA 2.0 spec http://download.oracle.com/auth/otn-pub/jcp/persistence-2.0-fr-oth-JSpec/persistence-2_0-final-spec.pdf?e=1317047713&h=54831c176e81a244a4c309e13eba0b27 which tells me what to expect. ... ; import javax. persistence . FetchType ; import javax. persistence . ManyToOne ; ... @ ManyToOne ( fetch = FetchType . LAZY ) @ MapsId ( "cont" ) ...
Removing an entity throws exception
Hi all, I'm testing ObjectDB for my project, but I have troubles with it. At this time I'm not able to remove customer entity, when it's read by a query (it's attached), it throws this exception: Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.RuntimeException: com.objectdb.o._RollbackException: Failed to commit transaction: 51 ... ... = CascadeType . ALL , fetch = FetchType . EAGER , optional = false , ... mappedBy = "customer" , fetch = FetchType . LAZY ) private List<Item> itemList ; ... mappedBy = "customer" , fetch = FetchType . LAZY ) private List<OtherItem> ...
Mapped (Inverse) LAZY @OneToMany vs. Unmapped LAZY @OneToMany
In the code example below (also attached) I would like to understand why I am able to print to console a lazy @OneToMany mapped field after a finding entity manager closes. There is a switch DO_VIEW_BEFORE_CLOSE, and when it is true the fields are accessed and output before the finding entity manager closes and as expected both a mapped @OneToMany list and an unmapped @OneToMany list are viewable: a.listA_mapped:[{A}[4]"ownedElement1", {A}[5]"ownedElement2"] a.listB_unmapped:[{B}[2]"b1", {B}[3]"b2"] ... @ ManyToOne ( fetch = FetchType . LAZY , cascade = CascadeType . ALL ) ... @ OneToMany ( fetch = FetchType . LAZY , mappedBy = "a" , cascade = ...