About JOIN

issue

Blocked by find

I have a container object which wraps an objectdb database. There is a "putIfAbsent(String id, Object obj)" method which is synchronized and attempts to load an object by id using the EntityManager "find" method. If nothing is returned from the db the passed object is persisted to the db. I have 5 threads which use this method. In a run today one of the threads seems to have got stuck somewhere in the find. The thread dump looks like: Bug Version: Priority: High Status: Fixed Replies: 23 Type:  Bug ...

 
issue

Unexpected error when loading all entity instance

Hi, when going through all entity instance to find orphaned entries we get the exception: Bug Version: 2.7.0 Priority: Critical Status: Fixed Replies: 19 Type:  Bug ...

 
forum_thread

Java 9 support

Hi,  is ObjectDB supporting Java 9 already ? If not when can we expect the support for it ? #1 2017-09-20 07:41 Hi,  is ObjectDB supporting Java 9 already ? If not when can we expect the support for it ? ...

 
forum_thread

Database size is much larger than expected (x2)

I store images into objectdb. The schema is : <URI>::=(<sUrl>, <cMark>, <iSize>, <baBody>, <id>) <sUrl>::=String <cMark>::=char <iSize>::=int <baBody>::=byte[] <id>::=@ID So simple a class will fail after 155,648 insertions with -Xmx1432m, #1 2011-08-18 02:10 I store images into objectdb. The schema is : <URI> ::= ( <sUrl>, <cMark&g ...

 
forum_thread

Activated ObjectDB still throws "Too many persistable types"

I have upgraded from 2.3.7 to 2.4.4 and now my activation won't work, throwing the dreaded com.objectdb.o.UserException: Too many persistable types (>10) - exceeds evaluation limit I have already reactivated and checked that my objectdb.conf is correctly used (by inserting random chars at the beginning of the file, which lead to an error). Yet I still get the error thrown. Nothing in my configuration changed except the version. What could possibly be the problem with that? #1 2012-10-29 14:43 I have upgraded from 2.3.7 to 2.4.4 and now my activation won't work, throwing the dreaded com. objec ...

 
forum_thread

Check for index existence ?

Hello, Is there a simple way to check if indexes specified in entities are well taken into account by ObjectDb ? Regards, Xirt #1 2016-08-06 16:09 Hello, Is there a simple way to check if indexes specified in entities are well taken into account by Obj ...

 
forum_thread

The server cannot start in CentOS

Hi, I try to run ObjectDB from Linux, but failed. My command is: java -cp objectdb.jar com.objectdb.Server start The result is attached. After typing the command, the system seems halting. #1 2011-05-25 08:38 Hi, I try to run ObjectDB from Linux, but failed. My command is: java -cp objectdb.jar com.objec ...

 
forum_thread

Unexpected internal exception during set field of an Embeddable to null

Hello, we get an Unexpected internal exception and have no idea what goes wrong. We can reproduce (mostly) the error in a very big use case. In the big use case and we create and persist millions of SignalValueImpl objects (Embeddables). Partly as in the stack trace an Embeddable contain another Embeddable. It seems like that we can't reproduce the problem in smaller use cases with less objects. Stack trace: #1 2016-06-24 08:36 Hello, we get an Unexpected internal exception and have no idea what goes wrong. We can reproduce ...

 
release

2.5.3

... and maps of invalid types. Changed JOIN FETCH to act as LEFT JOIN in path expressions. Updated the PDF manual. ...

 
forum_thread

How to change properties in urls2.xml?

Hello, I am using objectdb in an embedded case with network private access to each database. I see it exists a file name "urls2.xml". <url><main>/var/lib/tomcat7/db/myDb.odb;user=admin;password=admin</main><alt>objectdb://127.0.0.1:38059/;user=$code;password=a2e54ea3-d889-41a7-953c-dabc42877742</alt></url> This file is autogenerated by objectdb. And it describes the locals databases url and their port / user / password properties. #1 2013-09-09 15:52 Hello, I am using objectdb in an embedded case with network private access to each database. I see it ...