Home » Search

About Timestamp

31-40 of 55Refresh
Forum
3

Database is locked when in use

dont want the timestamp directory to be created, what extra needs to be done. You should be able ... of both interfaces. Thanks. How should i get rid of Timestamp directory ? I am going to use the follwoing code ... to be placed in "backup" directory not backup/[timestamp] directory. There is an undocumented parameter
Forum
3

Error 363 - Failed to read value of inverse relationship

) private String playerName, password, email; @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP) private Date ... id; @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP) private Date sendDate = new Date(); private ... ; //    //    @Id //    @GeneratedValue //    private Long id; // //    @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP
Forum
3

java.sql.Time field off by 30 minutes

well. Timestamp works perfectly fine. Ps. dont think its a UTC issue. My system is set at far off UTC+30min ... =             new java.sql.Time(System.currentTimeMillis());         java.sql.Timestamp mytimestamp =             new java.sql.Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());         @Override
Forum
3

Unexpected COUNT Results

explorer: 1.       Using ObjectDB explorer a.       SELECT $1.id FROM Pa3DataKey $1 WHERE $1.timestamp ... .id) FROM Pa3DataKey $1 WHERE $1.timestamp <= 187526 AND ($1.dataItems.get('Sender') != 'PHY' AND $1 ... .       SELECT COUNT($1.id) FROM Pa3DataKey $1 WHERE $1.timestamp <= 187526 AND ($1.dataItems.get('Receiver
Forum
3

objectdb-2.6.9_02 (with "objectdb.temp.no-enhancement-crc-check") vs. generic classes with interfaces: detailed investigation

for entity classes. - I have also used UNIX file timestamp checking to ensure enhancement from Clean and Build has not been corrupted. - No javaagent enhancement is used at any stage (and timestamp checking ... the timestamp of the enhanced entity classes, and they are time-stamped according to the Clean
Issue
2

Best practice for history tracking

We would like to add to records start and end timestamp fields. When end field is null, it indicates the last version of this item. Few questions: in terms of performance, what would be faster, having a single timestamp and looking for the top1 when ordered by time or the above solution, looking
Forum
2

Group by date / time

Timestamp(c.getTime().getTime());         em.persist(e1);         em.getTransaction().commit ... {         private Timestamp t;     }   } should produce this output: [[2099, 12, 31, 11, 59, 58]] Thanks a lot! Everything works as expected :) lwalkowski
Forum
2

Internal exception when updating date filed (TemporalType.DATE)

.randomUUID().toString();         @Temporal(javax.persistence.TemporalType.TIMESTAMP) @Index ... .TIMESTAMP)         private Date modifyDate = new Date();         private String name;         @Index
Forum
2

Order in WHERE Clause affects behaviour on DATE/DATETIME columns

Quick example:  public class MyClass { @Column(name = "myText") String myText; @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP) @Column(name = "myDate") Date myDate; } Now ... haven't declared the query parameter as TemporalType.TIMESTAMP. But when I write following query
Forum
1

ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

may cause an infinite update process. This requires rethinking. Maybe class file timestamps