Home » Search

About concurrency

61-70 of 101Refresh
Forum
2

Spring LTW Problem

) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread
Forum
2

use of Singleton into tomcat

the concurrency for the operations on db............... with a method static i can get the only instance ... it call the methods on mode concurrent????? write me a example . i wait for a response. tank you mauro
Forum
2

UserException - Object User#2 belongs to another EntityManager

) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java
Result
1

ObjectDB version 2.2.5

entity object. Fixed merging entity objects of another EntityManager. Fixed a bug in concurrent
Result
1

ObjectDB version 2.6.2

#1635). Fixed a NullPointerException on concurrent access of first object of an entity class. Fixed
Result
1

ObjectDB version 2.7.2

for possibly improved concurrent database file access. Added automatic logging of query details
Forum
1

Accessiblity of attributes in entities in several OSGi-Bundles

one transaction from another concurrent transaction that cannot yet see the operations of the first
Forum
1

client server set up and load

Hello All, Can objectdb handle client - server connections from over 200 users? Can it be efficiently used in client-server mode? Code examples where possible will be appreciated. Thank you. Regards ObjectDB can handle concurrently 200 users (or more). The maximum load is less affected by number
Issue
1

Database access error , Doctor hanging on trying to repair, production shutdown at our biggest customer

with older versions with the concurrent read queries that have been solved for us with that version
Forum
1

Embedded & Activation & Scalation

time.. ?   Alex Multiple processes cannot write to the same ObjectDB database concurrently. Future