 2 | to java.util.ArrayList instance as a persistent field. Thanks for the fast response, but I don't know ... to another. And overall, thanks again for your fast help. It pushes objectDb to the top |
2 | with URL: http://localhost:8080/1/age => If you try this on Windows, last call is working blazing fast ... more details about your issue. The original post doesn't discuss fast execution on Windows and slow |
1 | Hello , I've read some docs : http://biemond.blogspot.com/2010/04/super-fast-jpa-with-mysql-cluster-and.html http://dev.mysql.com/doc/ndbapi/en/mccj-using-jpa.html http://ocklin.blogspot.com/2009/12/java-and-openjpa-for-mysql-cluster_14.html These documents telling us they did native JPA |
1 | the old object. Thanks for your fast answer. Is there any reason why ObjectDB/ObjectDB E shouldn't |
1 | to your product. It's really fast. Please try build 2.3.1_04 that should fix these exceptions |
1 | , so you don't have to create an index for the id. The thing is that I noticed it's really fast |
1 | , and the system crashes because of another reason. thanks for such a fast reply. I try to open the odb file on Win |
1 | the recording to a different fast disk then the effect may not be that bad but it has to be checked |
1 | to get more information on the registered type. Thank you for your fast and effective response to my issue - the new logging option should help solve things. sjzlondon |
1 | version 2.5.1. That would be a much easier solution. Thank you for your fast and effective responses |