7 | CriteriaQuery .where() for multiple conditions.getTransaction().rollback(); } em.close(); } return person; } ThreaT Ashton Hogan Yes |
7 | Multiple Collection Fields not update correctly().isActive()) { em.getTransaction().rollback(); } em.close(); } now I look at the data, I |
7 | Optimistic locking: prevent version increment on entity collection attribute constructor and we are still in the same transaction (before any commit or rollback). In the debugger |
7 | Database Files.getTransaction().isActive()) { em.getTransaction().rollback(); } } } Trianglehead Json Error The default |
7 | Date field Index is corrupted due to time change(); if (em.getTransaction().isActive()) em.getTransaction().rollback |
7 | Bug with unique constraint exception not resulting in transaction roll back a transaction rollback as expected. However, this same method is where the persistence is happening |
7 | How to delete M2M relationship? if (transaction != null && transaction.isActive()) { transaction.rollback |
7 | Rename Application StringIdentity.isActive()) transaction.rollback(); } Would the above code keep my persisted object in the ObjectDB |
1 | ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException on flush().rollback(); throw new ApplicationException("Error flushing graph container", e); } finally |
1 | Unexpected exception (Error 990) - NullPointerException, that the transaction has been marked for rollback. Why it has been marked was not clear. KFlash Kevin |
