 1 | implements Serializable {
@Id
private String id;
private String town;
public |
1 | Serializable {
private static final Integer decrease = 20; // percent
//
@Id
private |
1 | The @Converter annotation and the Attribute Converter interface have two big benefits: 1) They make it possible to persist any as-yet-unsupported java types that do not implement java.io.Serializable. (If they do, it is possible to persist them automatically by turning on the |
1 | A implements Serializable {
}
@Entity
public static class B |
1 | In the docs, all serializable types should be persistable. However, when I tried to persist a field of type AtomicInteger, I got the following message: Message: Failed to commit transaction: Attempt to store an instance of a non persistable type java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger I am using |
1 | Hi, Is there a reason why we can't persist an object with a field of type EnumMap in ObjectDB? but it works fine for fields like = HashMap Thanks EKK You can persist any Serializable type if you enable this ability in the configuration. But using this feature is not recommended |
1 | is a universal base class entity (except that it in turn inherits from a non-entity Serializable class |
1 | . It implements java.io.Serializable but probably this is not sufficient for GWT because Date is a special |
1 | . What could be the other reason it's still working for me? my entity class is Serializable though. I'm |
1 | :
abstract class AuEntity implements Serializable { @Id @GeneratedValue long id |
