About setup

41-50 of 57Refresh
Forum
2

Replication Error

Hello! I try to get a replication setup working on two test servers. So i copied my test database to one of them, enabled recording and started odb. The dbname.odr folder got created so i think everything is ok. Afterwards i added the replication tag to the configuration of the second server
Forum
2

2.7.3_03 Erroneous "Attempt to modify a primary key of a managed object"

will attempt that to see if it fixes my issue.   I am also investigating if my Java 9 module setup
Forum
2

Apparent Lazy Loading issues.

(this is what the unit test is setup testing at the mo). To reproduce the error, try replacing
Forum
2

BIRT plugin: Trouble with Client/Server connection

:6136) Nothing made it to the log. The following is my setup: Dev Versions:     MyEclipse Enterprise
Forum
2

Single Server License and Embedded Mode

We have an application that runs on a single server in embedded mode to write server million records.  Is it possible to use the single server license for embedded mode use?  I've looked through the forum, but haven't been able to determine how to configure this type of setup, if it is possible.  I
Forum
2

Stalling on "run File" in Netbeans when using -javaagent:lib/objectdb.jar

" without any further output. My setup is complicated by the fact that I use JRebel technology
Forum
2

Tomcat + JPA Problem

Hi i tried to setup the example from your webpage (jpa - Tomcat with Ecplipse) and i always get this Error: [ObjectDB 2.1.0] class "javax.persistence.Entity"'s signer information does not match signer information of other classes in the same package [ObjectDB 2.1.0] class "javax.persistence
Forum
2

Unable to store AtomicInteger

call an extra setup function in @PostLoad, which is very clunky in my opinion
Forum
2

UserException: Package com.example.model is not found by the enhancer

" + ".*"); during contextInitialization. In my setup I'm using JDK 8, Object DB and Embedded Tomcat 8.0.3 so after clean
Issue
2

Weird issue with variable naming

;   } } } oh and we re-use a join setup in our filter for the order by clause as well not sure if that makes