ObjectDB ObjectDB

Upgrade to 2.4.1_02

#1

Hi there,

The upgrade to 2.4.1_02 fixed the initial problem, however there still seems to be an issue. To me it appears that Embeddable might be being lazy loaded, but I cannot be sure. I have attached a testcase demonstrating this issue. Its failing on the merge.

Thanks

P.

edit
delete
#2

Sorry forgot the stack trace:

[ObjectDB 2.4.1_02] javax.persistence.PersistenceException
Failed to clear field property com.contextspace.AddressTest$AbstractContactDetail.type using reflection (error 363)
at com.objectdb.jpa.EMImpl.merge(EMImpl.java:454)
at com.contextspace.AddressTest.test(AddressTest.java:95)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
Caused by: com.objectdb.o.UserException: Failed to clear field property com.contextspace.AddressTest$AbstractContactDetail.type using reflection
at com.objectdb.o.MSG.d(MSG.java:74)
at com.objectdb.o.UMR.M(UMR.java:896)
at com.objectdb.o.UMR.v(UMR.java:526)
at com.objectdb.o.UML.t(UML.java:508)
at com.objectdb.o.MMM.ab(MMM.java:953)
at com.objectdb.o.UTY.aE(UTY.java:1145)
at com.objectdb.o.EMR.h(EMR.java:175)
at com.objectdb.o.TVS.Un(TVS.java:185)
at com.objectdb.o.CLT.visitRefs(CLT.java:160)
at com.objectdb.o.TVS.j(TVS.java:169)
at com.objectdb.o.TVS.cascade(TVS.java:156)
at com.objectdb.o.TVS.g(TVS.java:105)
at com.objectdb.o.TVS.g(TVS.java:93)
at com.objectdb.o.EMR.q(EMR.java:76)
at com.objectdb.jpa.EMImpl.merge(EMImpl.java:451)
... 24 more
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.objectdb.o.UMR$Z.C(UMR.java:1363)
at com.objectdb.o.UMR$Z.w(UMR.java:1357)
at com.objectdb.o.UMR.v(UMR.java:523)
... 36 more
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.contextspace.AddressTest$AbstractContactDetail.setObjectMetaDataChange(AddressTest.java:606)
at com.contextspace.AddressTest$AbstractContactDetail.setType(AddressTest.java:624)
... 43 more

edit
delete
#3

It seems that indeed there was a problem with embedded objects in merging.

Please try build 2.4.1_03.

ObjectDB Support
edit
delete

Reply

To post on this website please sign in.