18 | find() cost unreasonable time!="parent") protected Nodes parent; @OneToMany(mappedBy="parent",fetch=FetchType.EAGER) protected ... ") protected Nodes parent; @OneToMany(mappedBy="parent",fetch=FetchType.EAGER) protected List ... mappedBy="parent" from the definition of Sons: @OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.EAGER) Initialize |
17 | EntityManager JPA or JDO impl and different behavior; } @OneToMany(cascade=CascadeType.PERSIST, fetch=FetchType.EAGER) public List ... .ALL, fetch=FetchType.EAGER, orphanRemoval=true) //@ElementCollection(fetch=FetchType.EAGER ... , someObject> with eager fetch annotation and the map values were still lazy loaded(using the latest |
14 | Fetching Collections Puzzle If I dont declare explicitly the fetch strategy for "children" as FetchType.Eager, then how can I ... to Eager, the children field of all my retrieved nodes are of size zero When I declare the FetchType as Eager, then isn't the database actually retrieving the whole graph stored in the database |
14 | can't get HashMap out of the database the map with @OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.EAGER). Outside the DAO method only fields ... (issue #552) eager load didn't work for collections and maps of simple values. support Support Thanks ... Date signingDate; @OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.EAGER, cascade=CascadeType.ALL) private |
12 | Optimistic locking: prevent version increment on entity collection attribute side (Readings), added EAGER fetch to the collection no change. I have tried to persist the document first ... ManyToOne of the owning side (Readings), This should not make any difference. > added EAGER fetch to the collection no change. This should affect. An eager collection should be loaded |
12 | List of Enum Values in an entity detachment (e.g. defined as eager rather than lazy, or accessed) are available. One way to solve the problem is to change the fetch policy of the field from LAZY to EAGER: private @OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.EAGER) List<GuestFlag> flags; According to our checks this solves the problem |
12 | Annotate a Map field with @ElementCollection or @Basic. It could be due to the different default fetch value (LAZY for ElementCollection, EAGER for Basic). You may try using an @ElementCollection(fetch=FetchType.EAGER) and see if it is fast as @Basic support Support I tested it already with @ElementCollection(fetch=FetchType.EAGER). It is little bit faster as before |
11 | Performance issue in a query due to compareTo calls private long stepNumber; @OneToOne (fetch = FetchType.EAGER) private TCStep step ... as the add operations //per index in the list @ElementCollection (fetch = FetchType.EAGER ... Identifiable { @OneToOne (fetch = FetchType.EAGER) private TCStep step; btc_es BTC |
2 | Tracking changes to new collections (in enhancement mode) after flush.FIELD) @Column (name = "uid") private String uid; @OneToOne (fetch = FetchType.EAGER ... ; @OneToMany (fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade = {CascadeType.REFRESH, CascadeType.DETACH }) private ... MappingImpl { @Id private String uid; @OneToOne (fetch = FetchType.EAGER |
2 | ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException CacheableJobStat { @OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER) private CacheableJobInfo ji; @OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER) private CacheableJobLog jl; } Where CacheableJobInfo and CacheableJoLog ... .EAGER) annotation. I am not sure wheather this annotation is allowed when not cascade persist |
