Internal Website Search

; } public abstract class BDO implements BDOInterface {     private String oid ... ------------------- [1] Page #19753 entry 0 has unexpected field count (7 instead of 5) 0. oid = '567651' 1. deleted ... #33279 entry 1 has unexpected field count (7 instead of 5) 0. oid = '559770' 1. deleted = false 2

1 (with an OID for every instance) and all other classes were embedded (so without extent and own OID ) in those few peristence-capable ones. Example of JDO metadata:         ... as not embedded, with own extent and OID for every instance. So my questions are: 1

, but that would also require maintaining the OID for everything. Anyway, what are your thoughts on this? I ... identifier and a mapping of that to the ObjectDB OID is used to delete the existing track data before

.domainId.accountId = :aid AND d.domainId.objectId = : oid "), @NamedQuery(name="Department.findByPK", query ... .getAccountId()); q.setParameter(" oid ", this.departmentId.getObjectId()); Department d = q

have been simplified) public MyClass retrieveMyClass(String oid , boolean makeTransient, MyContext context ... .newObjectIdInstance(AFPhysicalPart.class, oid ); physpart = (MyClass) pm.getObjectById(objectid, false

JDO and the object which I am getting is om.objectdb. OID not LongIdentity. I tried adding private

one, only it has different OID . Then I deleted 60 instances of Project from the ProjectVersionHistory

{             Object oid = null;