ObjectDB Database Search

;   System.setProperty("objectdb.temp.no-temp-file-purge", " true ");     ... ("objectdb.temp.no-temp-file-clean", " true "); You can try setting these system properties before accessing

), JDOHelper.class.getClassLoader()); pmf.setMultithreaded( true ); pmf.setNontransactionalRead( true

setting a system property:     System.setProperty("objectdb.temp.auto-flush", " true "); before loading ObjectDB, or as a JVM argument: java -Dobjectdb.temp.auto-flush= true ... support Support

();   for(XCCompetitorCount ico : list){    cop.add(ico);   }   this.loaded = true

= "estudiante", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true )     private List

which methods it is true and in which false? In addition, verify that the same EntityManager is used

;       emf CLOSED: " + !emf.isOpen()); } Output is true

: " + item); } } return "/emr/reports/vtms?faces-redirect= true "; } buddhika75 M H B Ariyaratne

), and only when I had 'objectdb.temp.no-detach' true . When I had 'objectdb.temp.no-detach

". If that's true , I'll be glad to hear about such a solution. Thanks in advanced, Yotam

(disk)? Can setting sync= true (for recovery) help with this issue, how will be the performance

to schema evolution, it typically occurs during development rather than in production. Is that true in

;          return true ;         

I am using objectdb 2.8.3, I have a Entity class with a column that is declared as  @Column(unique = true , nullable = false, length = 16)  but when i m trying to insert a string for that column with a string that has more than 16 character, not able to get any error or exception from

J visual vm is complaining of deadlock since upgrading to the 2.4.4_16 from _06 and using setting -Dobjectdb.temp.no-resize-clear= true The only other change is that we no longer create recovery or replay files as we were not using these. i have attached our full server strack trace

locking is off dmoshal David Moshal update 1: problem persists if optimistic locking set to true in

ObjectDB: System.setProperty("objectdb.temp.extended-ref-retrieval", " true ");     

;System.setProperty( "objectdb.temp.no-distinct-order-restrictions", " true "); Set the property before using

) look like this org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect thread 10 true false false create-drop I need

( { @Index( name = "MyClass_ind_1", members = { "oid" }, unique = " true " ) } ) @Entity public class

isUpdating = true ; } public abstract class AbstractTC extends BDOWA {     

setting. Accordingly you can try running the Explorer with this setting (-Dobjectdb.temp.page-file= true ). support Support

.MyEntity      true Otherwise, ObjectDB may search and register all the entity classes in the classpath. support Support

Hello, I have a class as follows: @Entity public class MyEntity {     boolean properties[]= new boolean[1024]; } I would like to query objects with feature '42': select me from MyEntity me where me.properties[42]= true Is it possible? Thank you! haromlabu Bela Haromlabu

) { this.groupsHash = groupsHash; } @Override public boolean equals(Object o) { if (this == o) return true ; if (o

Dear all, I have entities Invoice and InvoiceItem, their relation is defined: public class Invoice implements Serializable { ... @OneToMany(mappedBy="invoice", fetch=FetchType.EAGER,              orphanRemoval= true , cascade=CascadeType

for the @Id in JPA, right? That is true . 2, I add @index to each field of idxxxx; I am not sure

an explicit DISTINCT as a workaround until a fix is released: query.select(companyRoot).distinct( true

(Thread.java:722) WARNING: LDR5207: ASURLClassLoader EarClassLoader : doneCalled = true doneSnapshot

!= null && !this.id.equals(other.id))) { return false; } return true ; } @Override public String toString

.temp.no-schema-downgrade", " true "); (set this property before accessing ObjectDB or when running

( true ). Is there a better way to manage such changes (maybe automatically?). Please consider that I

;        return true ;        

to embedded ones in objectDB 1 ? 2. Could be that ObjectDB 2 is ignoring the "embedded= true

is a known indication). Unfortunately enabling enhancement using agent=" true " is not

my understanding of how @Stateless transactional methods & transactional EM work. Isn't that true ? Used

;  System.setProperty("com.objectdb.disable.optimization.small", " true "); Any ... .properties" But after adding the condition 3 4, which should always be true , the query works "SELECT

switching in master-slave replication. Fixed a bug in applying orphanRemoval= true by default on mapped by

(orphanRemoval= true , cascade=CascadeType.ALL) private Map _nodes; The TaskNode contains a further Entity

.get("name"))));   query.select(root).distinct( true );   List result = em.createQuery(query

.no-schema-upgrade", " true "); EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("D:\\odb

{   @OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true )  

, CascadeType.PERSIST}, mappedBy="account", fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name = "project_id", unique= true

of running. We would like to avoid using synchronized=" true " due to performance reason. I am going to run

;  // System.setProperty("objectdb.temp.no-detach", " true ");       

.objectdb.disable.optimization.small", " true "); But it might help (if at all) only with a new database

;   @Persistent(dependent=" true ")         private List dependents;    

, which should work unless exclude-unlisted-classes= true  is specified in the persistence.xml

= true ) AND NOT (((com.lexware.vereinsverwaltung.abrechnung.api.model.mitglied

always be able to complete a full recovery. Only  sync=" true " guaranties that the recovery