Internal Website Search

clause . Order Direction (ASC, DESC ) The default ordering direction is ascending ... the DESC keyword must be added explicitly to the order expression: SELECT c.name FROM Country c ORDER BY c.name DESC Grouping (GROUP BY) Order The ORDER BY clause is always the last in the query

JPA Method in javax.persistence.criteria.CriteriaBuilder Order desc (    Expression  x ) Create an ordering by the descending value of the expression. Parameters: x - expression used to define the ordering Return: descending ordering corresponding to the expression Since: JPA 2.0

descending ( DESC ). The CriteriaBuilder 's asc and desc methods take an expression and return

_TIME, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,DELETE, DESC , DISTINCT, ELSE, EMPTY, END, ENTRY, ESCAPE, EXISTS, FALSE, FETCH

, ...). Criteria ORDER BY  ( orderBy , Order , asc , desc ).

and aggregates ). ORDER BY (including ASC, DESC ). Aggregates (COUNT, SUM, AVG, MAX, MIN). Query

, avg , min , max , ...). ORDER BY clause ( orderBy , Order , asc , desc ). The links above are direct

for all object Goods successfully] 04 SELECT u FROM Goods u where u._code like :code AND u._ desc like : desc   05 code= %, desc = % 06 UI: end query 07 UI: start printing result 08 code= A, desc = Good A, byUser= test 09 code= B, desc = Good B, byUser= test 10 code= C, desc = Good C, byUser= test 11 UI: end

)approveEmail DESC and SELECT approveEmail FROM Person ORDER BY approveEmail DESC return different results ... FROM Person ORDER BY (int)approveEmail DESC works fine. Query SELECT approveEmail FROM Person ORDER BY (int)approveEmail + (int)approvePhoneNumber DESC works fine. Criteria query CriteriaBuilder cb

by id desc   With the query limited to (say) 10 results. Is there any obvious way to speed ... == :objectReference order by id desc when an index is defined on the reference field should use that index ... where receiver == :r order by id desc Query Plan Description ====================== [Step 1] Scan index com

BY r.startDate DESC , r.startTime DESC , r.channelNumber DESC   The following query works fine ... ' AND '2099')) OR ((r.fromExtension BETWEEN '2010' AND '2099'))) ORDER BY r.startDate DESC , r.startTime DESC , r.channelNumber DESC   In both cases we limit the result count to the first 50 records

] [ASC | DESC ] If ASC or DESC is not specified, ASC (ascending order) is assumed. If the ordering ... _or_field_name] [ASC | DESC ] If ASC or DESC is not specified, ASC (ascending order) is assumed

String desc ; public void setDescription(String desc ) { this. desc = desc ; } } class MessageServiceImpl

;   em.createQuery("select l from Location l order by l.id desc ", Location.class)    ... where l.id IN :ids order by l.id desc ", Location.class)         ... ("select l from Location l where l.town IN :towns order by l.town desc ", Location.class)   

-8553-cc5688ba142d') ORDER BY MAX($1.createDate) DESC   but this query returns an exception ... ) DESC   entity object is: @Entity public class ChatHistoryItem extends AbstractObject { private ... .createDate) DESC and even a simpler query: SELECT DISTINCT e FROM ChatHistoryItem e ORDER BY MAX(e

this query: (I know, it's not very efficient...) select i from Invoice i order by i.getPrice() desc /asc it gives the same order for desc and asc (every time asc) When the float is not calculated (only returned ... ORDER BY i.getPrice() DESC ");         List resultList = query

with the following query: SELECT r from RecordingMetaData AS r ORDER BY r.startDate DESC , r.startTime DESC , r.channelNumber DESC We limit the result to 50 records. Basically we wish to get the last 50 records

BY r.startDate DESC , r.startTime DESC ");         resultList = q ... from DateTime AS r ORDER BY r.startDateTime DESC ");        

; "ORDER BY item.sku DESC "        ,ProductData.class)   ... id WHERE item.sku = :key OR id = :id ORDER BY item.sku DESC You may also try this (not valid JPQL ... .apiId.identifier = :id ORDER BY item.sku DESC support Support

JPA Annotation Attribute in javax.persistence.OrderBy String value default "" An orderby_list . Specified as follows: orderby_list::= orderby_item [,orderby_item] orderby_item::= [property_or_field_name] [ASC | DESC ] If ASC or DESC is not specified, ASC (ascending order) is assumed

values apply. Example 1: @Column(name=" DESC ", nullable=false, length=512) public String getDescription() { return description; } Example 2: @Column(name=" DESC ", columnDefinition="CLOB NOT NULL", table="EMP

follows: column::= index_column [,index_column] index_column::= column_name [ASC | DESC ] If ASC or DESC is not specified, ASC (ascending order) is assumed. See Also: Table SecondaryTable

;     q = "select br from Branch br ORDER BY ?1 DESC ";      ... = "select br from Branch br ORDER BY br.id DESC "; icQuery = em.createQuery(q, Branch.class

one that is contained within the System Description. public static Program programByDescription(String desc ) { for(Program p : allPrograms()) if( desc .contains(p.getDescription())) return p; return null

: expression for current timestamp Since: JPA 2.0 Order desc ( Expression  x) Create an ordering by

Inspiration insp order by date(insp.lastModificationDate) desc insp.description is normal String

then " desc emp;"  it will show the structure of table. Bimal Bimal kumar dalei ObjectDB is not

We are using ObjectDB 2.5.1_04. The following query causes an internal null pointer exception: SELECT r FROM RecordingMetaData AS r WHERE ((r.mapToCli != '192.168.10.200:9085' AND r.callDirection == 0)) ORDER BY r.startDateTime DESC If we remove the ORDER BY part, the query completes OK

("configDate DESC ")     public List getChannelConfigurationSets() {     

order:     SELECT FROM MyEntity e WHERE ... ORDER BY e.date DESC Then you can run

." + sortColumn + " DESC ";    }    icQuery = em.createQuery(q, Product.class);  

In earlier versions this query worked fine. In version 2.5.2_05 does not work .orderBy(cb. desc (cb.greatest(root.get("createDate").as(Date.class)))).distinct(true) Thank you for your help. galandor Orlov Sergey Please try build 2.5.2_06 that should fix this regression (of casting to Date ). support Support

= query.from(MomentPayload.class); query.select(fromMomentPayload); query.orderBy(cb. desc ... ; query.orderBy(cb. desc (fromMomentPayload.get("dateTime")));        

indexes: SELECT m FROM Message m ORDER by priority DESC , createTime could even be faster if both sort ... with different ASC / DESC components will be supported in future versions. Meanwhile, consider reversing

We're creating a simple selection (distinct) including an order clause. When watching the created criteria in debugger we get the correct expression: SELECT DISTINCT $1 FROM MyEntity $1 WHERE ((TYPE($1)=class test.MyEntity)) ORDER BY UPPER($1.name) DESC You can see that in the order by

.parentNode.classIdentifier = "(ME)" order by o.parentNode.modified desc database can be downloaded

_changeSet.index desc With the parameter ?1 = "b07f5cd0-de22-11e6-8f0c-da13fcef2539". This query

.createQuery( "SELECT p FROM EventLogPersistEntry p ORDER BY p.id DESC ", EventLogPersistEntry.class

;   orderBy(cb. desc (r.get("objectDbId")));     TypedQuery query = entityManager

.parentNode.classIdentifier = "(ME)" order by o.parentNode.modified desc     hgzwicker Hans