ObjectDB Database Search

de.solvit.objectdbtest.entity.Street; import java.util. Arrays ; import java.util.List; import java.util ... class Main {     private static final List locations = Arrays .asList(    ... ;  );     private static final List streets = Arrays .asList(     

check the attachments. I believe this could be caused by having an array of objects as the value in ... data. support Support Thanks for your help. The issue with the object array in a map I will solve via some migration to a structure where the value in the map will be a user defined class containing the array . jakab Gergely Jakab

: ... For example, the Arrays .asList method returns an instance of an internal Java collection type ... EntityWithList { private List words = Arrays .asList("not", "ArrayList"); } @Entity public class Point ... defined classes. Notice, however, that similarly to the  Arrays .asList example from the manual

which the execution of multiple queries increasingly byte array were generated (about 1.5 GB) which from GC ... byte array are still not released. The option objectdb.temp.avoid-page-recycle makes no change ... (line 92). btc_es BTC EmbeddedSystems Addendum: With the configuration is the byte array only 3MB. I

the entity containing another one (OneToOne) entity with a byte[] array without calling the getter of the array of the child entity, the array becomes null. public class ByteData { // ... id private byte

/UML2. to persist the images, i just store an array of bytes (byte[]) representing the encoded images.  i.e. a class which has a field of type byte array .  to turn the bytes into an image, i ... well for me, but I'm guessing there's an easier way. so, yes, the equivalent of blobs (byte arrays ) are supported

", only contains a byte[] and uses a soft reference to make that array eligible for GC when the JVM does a full GC. private byte[] data;// use makeDirty() when changing this array or any

gzdillon Lai Yang The length field of arrays is not supported by JDOQL / JPQL queries. You may maintain an ordinary int field (holding the array length) for this purpose. support Support

Device instances per second. But Device is a large object with an array of 100 strings (by the way ... instances per second, and with null in the String[] array the rate goes up to 200,000 entity objects

. Arrays .copyOfRange( Arrays .java:2694) at java.lang.String. (String.java:203) at com.objectdb.o.BYR.N

.objectdbtest; import de.solvit.objectdbtest.entity.Location; import java.util. Arrays ; import java.util.List ... ; private static final List locations = Arrays .asList(         new

;query.setParameter("enumFieldList",          Arrays .asList ... .setParameter("enumFieldList",             Arrays

;      query.setParameter("names", Arrays .asList("a", "c"));    ... FROM Prez p WHERE p.id MEMBER OF :ids", Prez.class); prezs.setParameter("ids", Arrays .asList(1,3

a very large array in the debugger). This will limit retrieval to open branches in the tree. 3

;How does odb handle byte[]. A byte[] field is stored in the containing object, as any other array

.getNormName()");         query.setParameter("names", Arrays .asList

without any problem. In the explorer I can see that it is stored as array of Strings. Unfortunately

.If there will be getAddress method what data type it will be ? Array ?  4.I uploaded for you my entity class

at defineClass call in d method ACL class which is triggerd by i method of STL class. I think the byte array

addition, replace the ordinary array with a collection (e.g. ArrayList ). You may also need to use

and without, the object that JVisualVM showed as the biggest memory user was byte arrays - usually

Hi, Is it possible to write a JPA query to select objects that contain a collection of elements? For example, suppose I have a table that maps a search terms to pages: @Entity public class SearchIndex { @Index SearchTerm term; @Index Page page; } Now suppose I have an array of SearchTerm objects

in case anyone need to achieve the same. This call will retrieve a list of 3 dimensional Object array

it becomes a regular java.util. Array again which of course doesn't mark the object dirty when getting changed

the array of persistent fields of the  SignalValueImpl embedded class, which unexpectedly happens

out all empty arrays for the lists of PositionReportBeans contained within the PositionReportManagerBean

instances mainly contain arrays (or ArrayLists) and embedded objects. * A big benefit for my application

a endless array with message in users and users in message So my annotations are not right.  

Hello guys, i have a question regarding "objectdb.java.util.ArrayList" and performance. In my project i'm iterating over an array with about 100k items. Fetching them into the EntityManager takes about 120ms, but when i'm iterating over all of them (this is a tree structure, each

application, I don't have the source code for. So far I used object arrays and reflection to read

There is a problem with 2 Person instances, apparently in their salt byte[] array . There was a change in the way byte[] arrays are stored in ObjectDB. In theory this should not affect existing

), but still, if there is a bug that may cause storing arrays in a bad format - exploring it requires a way ... in checking byte arrays . Build 2.4.1 fixes this problem. support Support

, so we could even prevent the overflow of array index. For example via providing a public method ... : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Requested array size exceeds VM limit at com.objectdb.o.FIW.m(FIW.java

) to-many relationship into an array field ([]) ( issue #1131 ). Fixed a bug in loading mapped (inverse

;     this.id = id;             this.dependents = Arrays .asList

Fixed a bug of  duplicating new objects during merge . Fixed a username/password issue in using EntityManagerFactory 's getMetamodel . Fixed a bug in detachment of hollow objects on close ( issue #799 ). Fixed a Doctor exception ( issue #796 ). Fixed a Doctor bug in checking byte[] arrays

file in place . Fixed a ClassCastException in query selection of embedded object and array fields

expected, array Tuple.b contains expected values. Also note that call to Lists.transform is evaluated

= Arrays .asList(new Chapter());         em.merge(book);   

a bug in comparing array fields against parameters in queries ( issue #2289 ). Fixed a bug in retrieving

persistent array fields with parameterized type . Added error on using transient fields (or properties