ObjectDB Database Search

JPA 2 supports both optimistic locking and pessimistic locking . Locking is essential to avoid ... is locked separately. Optimistic locking is applied on transaction commit. Any database object ... by another transaction. When using ObjectDB, optimistic locking is enabled by default and fully

Jakarta Persistence (JPA) Enum Constant in jakarta.persistence.LockModeType OPTIMISTIC Optimistic lock. Since: Jakarta Persistence (JPA) 2.0

Jakarta Persistence (JPA) Enum Constant in jakarta.persistence.LockModeType OPTIMISTIC _FORCE_INCREMENT Optimistic lock, with version update. Since: Jakarta Persistence (JPA) 2.0

We are having problems with optimistic locking. I made a simple test case to try to induce an optimistic lock. I have two users logged on to our system.  They both read and display the same ... . User 2 does not get an optimistic lock exception, so the database has user 2’s change

: Failed to commit transaction: Optimistic lock failed for object com.example.MyEntity#3 (object ... .objectdb.com/java/jpa/persistence/lock If you must avoid optimistic lock exceptions you can use pessimistic exceptions, but it is more efficient to remain with optimistic locking (which is the default

Optimistic locking failure: I am using a Semaphore to force this execution of concurrents ... . Martinez You are right again. To support this, starting build 2.3.7_24  OPTIMISTIC (READ) is implemented as  OPTIMISTIC _FORCE_INCREMENT (WRITE) . This is allowed by JPA, and is required by

Hi, I seem to be getting a lot of these optimistic locking errors: Caused by: com.objectdb.o._OptimisticLockException: Optimistic lock failed for object Is there any way to force the database to use ... , that setting is for optimistic locking. My question was about pessimistic locking (specifically

.OptimisticLockException Optimistic lock failed for object entities.Record#'1405/838/2011/121 ... .java:381) ... Thank you! adibe Adi Be Optimistic locking is explained in this manual page . support Support

. The second example is an OSGi program which fails with an optimistic lock exception. Both examples ... ). Can you explain the optimistic lock exception? It seems that the first level cache contains yet a dirty entity

Hello, I have an entity E with an attribute which is a collection of entities (one to many relationship) with an optimistic locking strategy supported by a version field. Is it possible to prevent the increment of the version of entity E when entities are added to or removed from the collection

Hello When I get an optimistic lock on an object, refresh(), start trans and persist?  Will the changes made to the object before the violation be retained or must they be duplicated in the retry code?  Assuming it affects only one object.  tia. cpanon CP The exact situation

Optimistic Lock Exception With No Concurrency

attribute of the element specifies if optimistic locking is enabled. Optimistic locking is completely

is automatically increased by one. Version fields are used in conjunction with optimistic locking ... . Therefore, optimistic locking is supported by ObjectDB even when a version field is not defined

, Comparable , Serializable Enumerates the kinds of optimistic or pessimistic lock ... refresh() ), or to Query.setLockMode or TypedQuery.setLockMode . Optimistic locks are specified using LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC and OPTIMISTIC _FORCE_INCREMENT . The lock mode types READ and WRITE

by calling flush . At any given moment, a persistence context might hold an optimistic or ... , the persistence provider must perform optimistic version checks when obtaining the database lock ... - if an unsupported lock call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic version check fails

automatic optimistic locking to prevent concurrent changes to entity objects by multiple users. JPA 2

, which is used to detect optimistic lock failures, ensuring the integrity of optimistic transactions. The version ... held by an entity class instance. An optimistic lock failure occurs when verification of the version

Have read read the documentation on optimistic locks, still not sure how to deal ... : Optimistic lock failed for object   dmoshal David Moshal perhaps I should explain the problem, which is that the optimistic lock exception fails repeatedly once the object is modified from

.currentTransaction()? 3) Does it lock at transaction.begin() if optimistic =false?  4) Does it lock at transaction.commit() if optimistic =true? 5) ObjectDB 1.0 Manual (Support Knowledge Base ObjectDB 1.0 ... optimistic =true, perhaps implying optimistic =true now has less overhead either way.  Maybe a shared

Jakarta Persistence (JPA) Enum Constant in jakarta.persistence.LockModeType READ Synonymous with LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC . OPTIMISTIC is preferred for new applications. Since: Jakarta Persistence (JPA) 1.0

Jakarta Persistence (JPA) Enum Constant in jakarta.persistence.LockModeType WRITE Synonymous with LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC _FORCE_INCREMENT . OPTIMISTIC _FORCE_INCREMENT is preferred for new applications. Since: Jakarta Persistence (JPA) 1.0

attribute, the persistence provider must also perform optimistic version checks when obtaining ... call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic version check fails. TransactionRequiredException

and the entity contains a version attribute, the persistence provider must also perform optimistic version ... lock call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic version check fails

, the persistence provider must also perform optimistic version checks when obtaining the database ... call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic version check fails

and the entity has a version attribute, the persistence provider must perform optimistic version checks ... . PersistenceException - if an unsupported lock call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic

attribute, the persistence provider must perform optimistic version checks when obtaining the database ... . PersistenceException - if an unsupported lock call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic version check

has a version attribute, the persistence provider must perform optimistic version checks ... call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic version check fails. TransactionRequiredException

optimistic version checks when obtaining the database lock. If these checks fail ... . PersistenceException - if an unsupported lock call is made. OptimisticLockException - if the optimistic

a value used to detect optimistic lock failure. Fields or properties of an entity class

by the SQL query. Default: LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC Since: Jakarta Persistence (JPA) 3.2 FieldResult

optimistic locking checks. Portable applications using bulk update operations must manually update

by the persistence provider when an optimistic locking conflict occurs. This exception

the entity from the database. After commit the transaction an exception is caused with optimistic ... flushing changes to the database. You may also  disable optimistic locking checks   ... plugins. This leads to the optimistic lock exception. But the ObjectDB throws the changes of the entity

._OptimisticLockException: Optimistic lock failed for object model.UserSession#28 (object has version ... be wrong here. EDIT: Merge will attach Willks William Optimistic locking is enabled by ObjectDB automatically even if no version field is defined. You can disable optimistic locking checks  

Jakarta Persistence (JPA) Method in jakarta.persistence.EntityResult LockModeType lockMode The lock mode obtained by the SQL query. Default: LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC Since: Jakarta Persistence (JPA) 3.2

, to reduce the chance of an optimistic lock failure.             pm ... ;     // In case of an optimistic lock failure, get the latest version, and loop back to redo ... of an optimistic lock failure. Make changes and commit them. Handle

: javax.jdo.option. Optimistic =false javax.jdo.option.NontransactionalRead=true javax.jdo.option ... we use the following options in DB2: javax.jdo.option. Optimistic =true javax.jdo.option ... .jdo.option.RestoreValues=false The DB2 returns the message " Optimistic lock failed for object" or

:                 dmoshal David Moshal note: optimistic locking is off dmoshal David Moshal update 1: problem persists if optimistic locking set to true in

). Thanks again for the prompt answers. In the meantime, I'll use an optimistic lock and fail

.CheckCacheThenDatabase); /* q.setLockMode(LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC ); */ try { java.lang.Object r = q.getSingleResult

(included in the download). Added support of disabling optimistic locking exceptions . Added support

a different update of that specific object using the first EntityManager , due the default optimistic

._OptimisticLockException: Optimistic lock failed for object application.model.Paygrade#184 (object

that this happens when an optimistic lock exception is thrown during commit, and failed (locked ... hgzwicker Hans-Georg Zwicker Which trace? The log just shows locations of optimistic lock exceptions ... when there is an optimistic lock exception on a large object (= ~2KB). Assuming you have ObjectDB 2.7.2

(entity version = 1) and committed, during the commit an optimistic lock exception is thrown. The version ... : Failed to commit transaction: Optimistic lock failed for object com.btc.ep.base.bl.internal.entities ... : com.objectdb.o._OptimisticLockException: Optimistic lock failed for object com.btc.ep.base.bl

also 2.7.1_03 and with this one we get an optimistic lock exception without enhancement. If we enhance ... ;an optimistic lock exception. More information and possibly a test case that demonstrates the exception ... of the optimistic lock exception and we fixed it in our code. From my sight of view this issue is fixed. btc_es BTC EmbeddedSystems

of entity classes ( issue #672 ). Fixed LockModeType. OPTIMISTIC ( READ ) by handling it as OPTIMISTIC _FORCE_INCREMENT . Fixed a bug in optimistic locking on find by using LockModeType.WRITE . Fixed

of connections specified in configuration. Fixed optimistic lock exception on removing of a flushed modified

We use an OSGi environment and we have three OSGi plugins.   In plugin A an entity is loaded and the entity is passed to plugin B. Plugin B changes an attribute on the entity. Plugin C removes the entity from the database. After commit the transaction an exception is caused with optimistic