Internal Website Search
141-150 of 172 resultsRefreshHow to disable Transparent Update. transparent update. You can detach the first object or load it using another | |
ObjectDB version 2.1 has been released the Explorer. Fixed detachment of entities by replacing proxy objects | |
Possible issue with LAZY Loading are detached. In this case, LAZY data will not be available and will not be fetched either. support | |
Significant I/O costs during batch update or insert data. Our application has some complex entities. We do batch update(merge detached entity) every 2 minutes. We find the period significant IO costs these days, and disappeared when turn off the batch updating. 1.ObjectDB is in embedded mode. 2.ObjectDB version is 2.3 | |
How do I achieve a Deep Fetch using JOIN FETCH? to be able to work with the whole C object, with all its parts, as a detached object. I know | |
OptimisticLockException are automatically detached at the end transaction. Yes, if | |
Problem with @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY).createQuery("select s from Sample s", Sample.class).getResultList().get(0); em.detach(sample | |
ObjectDB 2.6.5="/forum/1753">during time / time zone change. Fixed a bug in detachment | |
ObjectDB 2.3.2 a detached object (issue #527). Fixed a bug of changing id | |
Unexpected exception (Error 990) - Merge with no Transaction I am frequently having an error when merging a detached object outside of a transaction. (Is this allowed? I am not trying to modify the object, just read data from it.) Here is a test case: package com.experiments; import javax |