52 | can't get HashMap out of the database" nested object in the same test case is not returned, even though it gets stored in the database ... I'm trying to persist an Entity containing a HashMap. It stores the data in the database OK, but the map is always empty when I get the entity out of the database again. I've reproduced this problem |
52 | Delete object from collection versus delete from JPQL the synchronization between memory and database objects. See these manual pages for more details: DELETE ... relationship between the objects in memory and ObjectDB. I know I can modify the objects and use persist() to write them to the database. But does running a JPQL update or delete alter the in-memory |
52 | ObjectDB 2.6.9_06 (embedded): Cascading merge resulting in duplicate objects this class. If I load a NaturalPerson entity from the database, then add a new address to the object's "addresses" list and use EntityManager.merge(object) to persist it along with the new address ... This issue maybe related to issue #110 (http://www.objectdb.com/database/issue/110 |
52 | EntityManagerFactory objects being locked during EntityManager creation objects are being locked during EntityManager object creation. Please refer the below stacktrace ... .cap.consumerframework.database.ReprintCacheDatabase.createDao(ReprintCacheDatabase.java:60) "https ... .database.ReprintCacheDatabase.createDao(ReprintCacheDatabase.java:60) at com.adheris.cap |
52 | "Attempt to lock a non entity object" errorProbably a simple answer for someone who's been using ObjectDB for awhile: I'm reading objects from the database outside a transaction (inside doesn't seem to matter). First cycle of doEdit ... object" session.rollback() is somehow causing the problem (found through debugging |
51 | Refresh data in application after database data has changedHi, I have a Java program that can manage and create some Person objects. When I start my application and I want to add a person with the same national number as a person already in the database, my program has to block the creation. So far so good. Now... I have a person in my database |
51 | persisting object with long[][] arrays of array. Persisting 100,000 small objects (arrays) to the database is expected to take much more time ... Hi, I have an object I am trying to persist (java) - It has several fields of type long ... (); Here is the object: import java.io.Serializable; import javax.persistence.CascadeType; import javax |
51 | Database size is much larger than expected (x2) images. The database size should be larger than the size of the image files on the file ... >>The database size should be larger than the size of the image files on the file system, but more than 100 ... } } The result database size is about 3GB as expected. support Support Another thing to check in your code |
51 | Object explorer cannot open odb file. ObjectDB many-to-many relationship.getAssignements().get(a11pk); assertEquals(p1, a11.getProject()); But: Question 1: After my test, the database ... get an Assignement object from User object and Underlying object (but not through theirs keys). I'd like to work with typed object in the code whenever possible, and make key usage as transparent as possible |
10 | Sort of very large objects - out of memory the following actions: 1) Create 5 persist threads which create and persist a large object in a loop 100 times each 2) Create 5 get threads which read 100 objects each in a loop based on object ... of "live" data in play at any time. The objectdb cache settings are low in the config - database |
