Internal Website Search

( mappedBy ="department") Set employees; } The mappedBy element (above) specifies that the employees ... .department = :d The mappedBy element defines a bidirectional relationship. In a bidirectional relationship ... annotation: @Entity public class Department { @OneToMany ( mappedBy ="department") @OrderBy ("name

invoices without items! Only invoices with items. When I remove mappedBy from @OneToMany annotation ... public class Invoice { @OneToMany( mappedBy = "invoice", fetch= FetchType.EAGER, orphanRemoval=true

If I put the mappedBy element to the @OneToMany, the owned side (the many side) will never persist ! for example @Entity public class Employee { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) public Long id; public String name; @OneToMany(targetEntity=Address.class, mappedBy ="employee

JPA Annotation Attribute in javax.persistence.OneToOne String mappedBy default "" (Optional) The field that owns the relationship. This element is only specified on the inverse (non-owning) side of the association. Since: JPA 1.0

JPA Annotation Attribute in javax.persistence.OneToMany String mappedBy default "" The field that owns the relationship. Required unless the relationship is unidirectional. Since: JPA 1.0

JPA Annotation Attribute in javax.persistence.ManyToMany String mappedBy default "" The field that owns the relationship. Required unless the relationship is unidirectional. Since: JPA 1.0

relationsto itself with a cascade refresh: @OneToMany( mappedBy = "person", cascade = CascadeType.ALL) private List openIdAuths = new ArrayList (); @OneToMany( mappedBy = "person", cascade = CascadeType ... private List selectedPersons = new ArrayList (); @ManyToMany( mappedBy = "selectedPersons", cascade

Given a mappedBy association: e.g: @OneToMany( mappedBy ="department") public List employees;   ... the department object" ? How does one refresh an object? If the mappedby tag maps to: SELECT e from EMPLOYEE e ... If the mappedby tag maps to: SELECT e from EMPLOYEE e WHERE e.department=department then shouldn't

{ @Id private String id; @OneToMany( mappedBy ="town") private Set events; public Set getEvents() { Set ... (), blockedUserList = new ArrayList (); @ManyToMany( mappedBy = "friendWishList") private List possibleFriends; @ManyToMany( mappedBy = "blockedUserList") private List invisibleUsers; @ManyToOne private

side. If the relationship is bidirectional, the non-owning side must use the mappedBy element of the ManyToMany ... is the owner of the relationship, the non-owning side must use the mappedBy element of the ManyToMany ... (".") notation syntax must be used in the mappedBy element to indicate the relationship attribute

with mappedBy to the parent. This just break the test !  Test by yourself by adding / removing the mappedBy on the OneToOne annotation. Note that i don't create any entity on that attribute. The test ... = MyEntityChild2.class)   @OneToOne(targetEntity = MyEntityChild2.class, mappedBy = "myEntity

the mappedBy element of the OneToOne annotation to specify the relationship field or property ... side must use the mappedBy element of the OneToOne annotation to specify the relationship field or property of the embeddable class. The dot (".") notation syntax must be used in the mappedBy element

; otherwise the target entity class must be specified. If the relationship is bidirectional, the mappedBy element ... , the mappedBy element must be used to specify the relationship field or property of the entity ... Customer class: @OneToMany(cascade=ALL, mappedBy ="customer") public Set getOrders() { return orders

seem to have some issues. I have changed my classes to have a OneTomany mappedBy relationship as follows ... ;  @Id private long id;        @OneToMany( mappedBy ="document")    ... static long ID_SEQ = 0; @Id private long id = ID_SEQ++; @OneToMany( mappedBy ="document") private

, cascade=CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "ticket",     orphanRemoval=true ... (EnumType.STRING) private Map states = new HashMap (); Is this correct now? " mappedBy " is not required ... @ MappedBy : In that case the map content will be stored embedded in the Ticket instances and no 

side must used the mappedBy element to specify the relationship field or property of the entity ... is bidirectional, the non-owning OneToMany entity side must use the mappedBy element of the OneToMany ... side of the relationship. The dot (".") notation syntax must be used in the mappedBy element

: @OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.ALL}, fetch = FetchType.LAZY/*, mappedBy = "person"*/) private Set ... Thanks for the reply. This looks great.   But without the mappedby , there are to independent ... ? Is there a way, not to change the code. Instead set a property to force objectdb to handle all mappedby as

? support Support While building test case I get two different cases: 1. When not using mappedBy , like in example above, detached objects are visible even after closing em. 2. When using mappedBy in class B (this is the case in my code), detached objects from relation are not visible. I should add mappedBy

Hi all, I have problems with builds 7 and 8 when trying to sort entities with mappedBy ... with null objects! With builds 6 and 5 works it correctly. Removing mappedBy from @OneToOne( mappedBy ... ; @OneToOne( mappedBy = "address") private Customer customer; public Customer getCustomer() { return

JDO Annotation Attribute in javax.jdo.annotations.Persistent String mappedBy default "" Name of the related member in the other class where this value is mapped (bidirectional relationship). Since: JDO 2.1

JDO Annotation Attribute in javax.jdo.annotations.Order String mappedBy default "" Name of a field or property in the target class that acts as the ordering field or property for this member. Return the name of the field or property in the target class Since: JDO 2.1

JDO Annotation Attribute in javax.jdo.annotations.Key String mappedBy default "" Name of a member in the value class where this key is stored. Since: JDO 2.1

JDO Annotation Attribute in javax.jdo.annotations.Value String mappedBy default "" Name of a member in the key class where this value is stored. Since: JDO 2.1

JDO Annotation Attribute in javax.jdo.annotations.Element String mappedBy default "" Name of the member in the target class that forms a bidirectional relationship with this member. Since: JDO 2.1

again :( ). Here is the test case : 1- Create 100 000 entities with for each 1 entity with @OneToOne( mappedBy ... = null;   @OneToOne(targetEntity = MyEntityChild.class, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "myEntity") // Test by adding / remove " mappedBy " public MyEntityChild getEntityChild() {  

Persona{ @OneToMany( mappedBy ="Pedido.cliente") public List pedidos; } The class Persona ... You have to change the value of the mappedBy attribute: @OneToMany( mappedBy ="cliente") i.e. specify the field

. Example 1: @Entity public class Department { ... @OneToMany( mappedBy ="department") @MapKey // map key ... () { ... } ... } Example 2: @Entity public class Department { ... @OneToMany( mappedBy ="department") @MapKey

( mappedBy = "address") public Set getEmployee() { return employee; } how can i solve this problem ... if it is bidirectional relationships also add a reference back from Address to Employee with a mappedBy setting

relationship: @ManyToOne private Message parent; @OneToMany( mappedBy = "parent") private TreeSet children ... an ordinary persistent field instead of as an inverse field - remove he mappedBy setting, and update

extends BaseCostElement { @OneToMany ( mappedBy = "parent" , fetch = FetchType. EAGER ) private List ... extends BaseCostElement { @OneToMany ( mappedBy = "parent" , fetch = FetchType. EAGER ) private List

): @Entity public static class Store { @OneToMany(targetEntity = Offer.class, mappedBy = "store ... = Offer.class, mappedBy = "product", fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL) private Set offers

serialVersionUID = 1L; @ManyToOne @Index private City city; @OneToMany( mappedBy = "owner") private List ... serialVersionUID = 33L; @OneToMany( mappedBy = "city") private List persons; @ManyToOne @Index private Person

String code;     @OneToMany( mappedBy = "user") @MapKey     private Map ... code;         @OneToMany( mappedBy = "project") @MapKey   

relationship using "two unidirectional relationships" which (I assume) would not include a mappedBy ... annotations with no mappedBy ): @Entity public class Entity1 {     Entity2 e2

this. Using JPA: @Entity class Customer { @OneToMany( mappedBy ="customer") Vector orders; }   ... other operations. support Support wow - just tried it, pretty impressive. I used JPA, and the @OneToMany( mappedBy

( mappedBy = "customer", fetch= FetchType.LAZY) private List itemList; @OneToMany( mappedBy = "customer

; @OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true, mappedBy ="project",fetch = FetchType.LAZY)   ... = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true, mappedBy ="project",fetch = FetchType.LAZY)    

{ ... @ManyToMany( mappedBy ="students") @OrderBy // ordering by primary key is assumed public List

.class) List phoneNumbers; } @Entity public class PhoneNumber { @Id int number; @ManyToMany( mappedBy

; objectdb-2.9.0_03  *   *         issue: Inverse @OneToMany( mappedBy ... ;    @OneToMany ( mappedBy = "a" )          public List abs ... ( mappedBy = "b" )          public List abs ;      

(and other classes). Please notice that ObjectDB can manage collections directly with no mappedBy - and it is also much more efficient. Therefore, consider removing the mappedBy definition instead ... of entities that are not used as a collection, I assumed a mappedBy relationship would be better

as follows; @OneToMany(cascade=CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy ="z_component") @MapKey(name="z_schemeName ... static class A {         @OneToMany(targetEntity = B.class, mappedBy ... (cascade=CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy ="z_aqera") @MapKey(name="z_registerId")     private

, CascadeType.PERSIST}, mappedBy ="account", fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name = "project_id", unique=true ... ;     mappedBy ="account", fetch = FetchType.LAZY)      

extends PersistableObject {     @OneToOne( mappedBy = "spouse")     private ... = Payment.Periodicity.QUARTERLY;     @OneToMany( mappedBy = "customer", fetch

ArrayList (); @OneToMany( mappedBy = "owner", cascade = CascadeType.ALL) public List getOwnedElements ... is to set the fetch type to EAGER: @OneToMany( mappedBy = "owner", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch=FetchType

) should be indexed. Since: JDO 2.1 String mappedBy default "" Name of a member in the key class

of the column(s) to use for ordering. Since: JDO 2.1 String mappedBy default "" Name of a field or

already loaded. Since: JDO 2.1 String mappedBy default "" Name of the related member in the other class

. Since: JDO 2.1 String mappedBy default "" Name of a member in the value class where this key is stored

"" Whether the value column(s) should be indexed. Since: JDO 2.1 String mappedBy default "" Name