ObjectDB Database Search
101-137 of 137 resultsRestrict by class in query;an IllegalArgumentException has to be thrown if the specified result type doesn't match | |
ObjectDB 2.x is working without any activation code your machines. ObjectDB will automatically find matching activation key in the list. support Support | |
Updating existing persistence entries runtime polymorphism and finds the correspondent row in the DB by the matching and unique ID field | |
Testimonials to use ObjectDB in your project you should probably take it for a drive test, to verify that it matches your specific project needs. support Support | |
Modifying something with Explorer -> app JPQL with Enum doesn't work anymore and enum class order don't match . The only ones that touched them are ObjectDB and Explorer, so maybe | |
JPA JPQL WHERE clause for IN :variable not working if variable is a list of Enums.setParameter("enumField2", MyEnumType.VALUE2); Then the matching objects are returned. I | |
java.sql.Date equals comparison not working with CriteriaAPI Hello, Using ODB 2.4.5 and the Criteria API, doing a simple equals comparison with java.sql.Date value doesn't match any results in the database. Our code looks like this: CriteriaBuilder builder = ...; Root root = ...; java.sql.Date myDate = ...; Predicate predicate = builder.equal(root | |
query on calendar class is for literals, so it cannot contain variables or parameters. In comparison the operand types must match . Not | |
Left join fetch behaviour doesn't retrieve children? are faster/slower in different conditions so there are no rules that match every situation | |
Mismatch client-server protocol prefix:757) I checked multiple times if the versions match . They do. DB server version 2.6.2. Client | |
Is it possible to commit only specific elements? elements"), so please use a new separate thread with a matching title. support Support | |
StackOverflowError after commit side), since it does not match the stack trace. In addition, this is only a partial stack trace. Please find | |
significant performance decrease (to return results without executing a query at all) if: There is match of the query string | |
String comparison in query where clause the parameter value is correct, and there should be a matching record in the database, but my query returns | |
NullPointerException in ENH.g(ENH.java:401) after time or the internal structure does not match anymore. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce the error | |
Order in WHERE Clause affects behaviour on DATE/DATETIME columns value [%myQuery%] did not match expected type [java.util.Date (n/a)] because I haven't declared | |
PersistenceException: Failed to locate field that do not have matching fields in the old schema are initialized with default values (0, false or null | |
2.7.3_03 Erroneous "Attempt to modify a primary key of a managed object" to be able to find the object using the String ID (must match exactly), so I make that all lower case | |
Problem with entities detection threads, one thread per issue with a title that matches the question. support Support | |
Warmup ( preLoad all table rows into memory ) a separate thread for every topic. The subject of the thread should match the content | |
OR not working with isNull Given the following: Predicate isOwnedByUser = cb.equal(root.get("owner").get("id"), userId); Predicate ownerIsNull = cb.isNull(root.get("owner")); Predicate ownerMatchesOrIsNull = cb.or(ownerIsNull, isOwnedByUser); The isNull predicate will only match records when NOT inside the OR predicate | |
Lock prevents PersistenceManager.close when retainValues = false are you using? The stack traces do not match the last version (2.7.6_01) so the line numbers don't indicate | |
Method not found on.... You have to match both the method name and the method arguments. In addition, in client-server mode | |
Getting this error when fetching records from mem db.. Strangely the stack trace does not match version 2.8.2. If you have more information such as | |
Unable to create 128 column of a table. match the reported version (2.8.3). Please double check which version/build you use. In addition | |
Embedded Entity in EmbeddedId not persisted. Error 631 at select..hibernate.jpa.HibernatePersistenceProvider - Found no matching persistence units Exception in thread "main | |
ObjectDB Unable to process 1.6 L records.. Manoj Manoj Kumar Maharana The stack trace in the log file does not seem to match version 2.8.2 | |
General Performance Issues Illustrated with a Specific Method, which matches exactly post #1 on this thread. It seems that this log file has many query executions (21 | |
Sometimes the ObjectDB throws an internal expeption if a persist() was executed on a machine without an ObjectDB license (no matching activation-code). The problem is now | |
Exception in thread "ODB-StoreHandler-5094" java.lang.NullPointerException the ObjectDB build number to get more information, as the line numbers in the stack trace do not match | |
Bug when using SIZE in combination with date lower parameter there are no matching jobs in the database? support Support Hello, yes, I can confirm that both queries | |
Internal Exception; issue #2153 . Apparently the stack trace in this new report doesn't match version 2.7.4_03 | |
ObjectDB 2.7.6 a constraint. Changed to-one mapped-by (inverse) relationship with multiple matching   | |
UPDATE statemen crash when i put the WHERE clause..createEntityManager() ; int lab_points ; for (List linie: linesAsList ) if (linie.get( 1 ). matches | |
Multiple MEMBER OF query over that collection is used for both occurrences, and that variable cannot match both sides | |
Enhancing a class causes it to not save changes. can match your needs. If you define all your persistent fields as private and access them using | |
Inverse OneToMany Mapping and EmbeddedId.HibernatePersistenceProvider - Found no matching persistence units [A [id=1, abs.size=1]] [B [id=1, abs |