ObjectDB Database Search

("listPatientsByIDsWithBasicData - start - " + st); List cs = new ArrayList (); if (ids == null || ids.trim ... - start - 1695401112698]] m = {q=0715812399}]] j = select new lk.gov.health.phsp.pojcs.ClientBasicData(c ... ]] listPatientsByIDsWithBasicData - start - 1695401637568]] m = {q=0715812399}]] j = select new lk.gov

erase the DB and start all over. But that's a problem. I have discovered it when I had to delete ... the elements in the development db, then upload the files on production, then start the app ... are deleted before starting ). The application doesn't use the classes from P2 in P1. Take as a proof

=. Build 2.4.7_17 fixes this behavior. support Support Thanks for the quick fix. This new version 2.4.7_17 fixes this issue. pezifromvienna Peter Sauer

you should move it to another directory. support Support Thanks for the quick reply. I've moved the file

field simply @Unique on the field. support Support Thanks for the quick reply! pezi Peter Sauer

shown on the first post. support Support This should probably work with ObjectDB as well, Quick test

in this project... Again, thanks for the quick support here! bklink Benjamin Klink An update

Quick example:  public class MyClass { @Column(name = "myText") String myText; @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP) @Column(name = "myDate") Date myDate; } Now, when querying the db with: Query q = JPA.em().createQuery("SELECT m FROM MyClass m WHERE m.myDate LIKE :query OR m.myText LIKE :query

you for your quick reply! I will resume the hunt as you suggest! :) brentfegley Brent Fegley

Thanks for your quick response. Your example works, but then I change the main method as follow

a quick solution. If the converter converts 99% of your data successfully, it would be better

the persistence unit must be enhanced. support Support Thanks for the quick and helpful reply.  

.clear();     em.close(); support Support thanks for quick reply. Currently

, but there is no quick and easy solution now for your immediate issue, so you may have to adjust

.objectdb.Server.main(Server.java:66) felixobjectdb Richard Szurgot I just ran a quick test

classes to store the data in ObjectDB."   I am doing this exactly. Here is the quick code I whipped

.. so they were not stored as expected. Thanks for ur quick answer - btw ObjectDB is really cool EKK Emmanuel Keskes Thanks support Support

Gazal It is seems to be online now. support Support Sorry. Then its probably a proxy/firewall issue here. Thank you for the quick response. gazal Mohamed Gazal

, thanks for a quick reply ! Will definitely give it a try then in our service POC.   Thanks and have a nice day, Dmitri   livotov Dmitri Livotov

and your quick fix are greatly appreciated. AlphaOne Ron Brennan

, false);   support Support Hi, thanks for your quick reply. It works great! skolb Sebastian Kolb

that should fix it. support Support Perfect - it is fixed - Thanks a lot - was very quick - I am impressed. EKK Emmanuel Keskes

the new version. support Support Thanks for quick implementation. There is only one small problem

Source) mimac Milan Fabian OK. Apparently the problem is clear now, and we are working on a quick fix

was when I find it. Your help and quick response was much appreciated. AlphaOne Ron Brennan Application

that. Thanks for the quick response.   Wim wim DC Wim De Clercq So I replaced my original code

). support Support Thanks for your quick response, it solves the issue of slowness. vinothr120 Vinoth Ramesh

for the quick response... thats got it!! pedwards Paul Edwards

/persistence-unit#Managed_Persistable_Classes And wasn't sure.   I appreciate the quick reply! Phil obiphil Philip Clapham

Support many thanks for the quick response Arne Arne Stocker

). See also "objectdb.temp.no-detach" as a possible quick workaround. support Support Loading it eagerly worked Unknown unknown

? If you do - this could be served for a quick initial implementation of this feature (hopefully in days

_06 now works great! Thank you very much for the quick build, I'm impressed by ObjectDB and the support. purecharger Ryan

lifecycle events (see this manual page ). support Support Thanks for the quick reply. I've

. support Support 2.2.5 does fix the issue. Thanks for the quick fix. n0mad Zakaria Yussuf

in the  posting instructions . support Support Hello, thanks for the quick answer!  

to my mvn repo and this fixed the problem. thank you very much for this very quick fix!   btw

in build 2.2.3_02. Please try it. support Support works perfectly, thanks again for this quick response chris Christoph Ernst

Thanks for the quick reply. It works now with the type java.util.Date, no casting was required for me. martijnvt Martijn van Tilburg

copy with the Doctor. With this arrangement you should find issues when they start (in that case ... is a pain, everytime we start it it connects directly to the database and then we have the access error ... ? Do you start seeing other database errors (in addition to the lock error) just after using the Explorer

list, and the configuration.   error list estoy aqui.... Exception in Application start method ... Application start method     at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl ... .App. start (App.java:24)     at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application

ObjectDb and another bundle which includes the POJO models. Everytime I start in plugin evironement ... .java:110) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher. start (EclipseAppLauncher ... :356) at com.objectdb.o.TYM.ay(TYM.java:1001) ... 66 more If I start my application with normal JUnit

objectdb.conf: How we test Teh issue happens with the first query that we run after we start the application that uses the DB in embedded mode. So we basically start the application and let is stabilise ... ", "startTime", "channelNumber"}) Start with a new empty database, in order to make sure that the new

for the quick reply! Should I open an issue for this technical debt? jleblanc Joel Leblanc This thread is now included also in the Issue Tracking . support Support

you for a quick turnaround. I can confirm it fixed using Build 2.2.5_10 longpat Brian O'Hare

a quick solution, you may try to remove the index, i.e. access the database with a class (in

. Anyway, please try build 2.4.0_03 that should fix this issue. support Support Thank you for the quick

. Added a new temporary system property ("objectdb.temp. quick -file") to accelerate db opening

connection, create an entitiy manager and start to read the first half of the MyValue objects in nested ... speeds up the application. At start of reading, the DB can deliver about 1000 values within 150ms ... should not concern. support Support I have rechecked: I changed the XML node to . Then I started

= ) 3. Load the next 10.000 instance and start over After a while and a lot of queries ... . Could you please provide a program that can demonstrate this corruption, i.e. starts with a valid database ... , start Tomcat). Using this approach it will be impossible for multiple processes to access