ObjectDB Database Search

me how to fix this state ? jakab Gergely Jakab The stack trace may indicate an incomplete enhancement . Try full clean build of your project with full enhancement of all your classes (particularly ... post compilation (build time) enhancement rather than on the fly enhancement . support Support

. Thanks. tester15 John The ObjectDB Enhancer adds members to enhanced entity classes ... better) solution. Enhancer generated methods do not have get/set prefix now (as was also until fixing ... of changes to accessor enhancement policy (non-getter prefix instead of getter suffix) AND annotations webel Dr Darren Kelly

Netbeans IDE. I am encountering the following problem when using enhancement with Netbeans IDE 7.1. To enable enhancement I use the following in the Project Properties dialog Run section under VM Options ... that ObjectDB class enhancement and JRebel "hot redeployment" class loading could somehow compete

Hello, I have question regarding OEM licencing. We have an enhanced entity that contains list ... // enhanced entity public final class Test { // non enhanced entity Internal @OneToMany(fetch ... and instances of unsigned classes are counted. In this case, if test is enhanced with an OEM activation

during enhancement ) for creation of all the managed entity objects (avoiding a more complex enhancement machanism ... even having 300 PC classes. In the future it could be an option for an enhancer to generate such constructors.   thanks br Tomasz Tomasz Tomasz Wozniak Thank you for the update. Maybe the enhancer

A possible reason could be a partial  enhancement . ObjectDB can populate fields in both enhancement mode ... are enhanced and some are not this could happen. Note also that null values are expected when viewing ... from the database. I don't specify Enhancement mode or Reflection mode anywhere. -dh dhosek Don

="query" give me nothing in output ( debug or trace ). name="*" give me some informations about enhanced ... , enhancement messages are client side). support Support I am using the embedded mode.  ... infos about enhanced classes ) when i replace query by "*" xirt Sylvain Maybe ObjectDB doesn't use

(); } I've managed to deduce that it only happens when classes  are enhanced .  When they are not enhanced , everything works fine. Once the error is hit, it keeps on happening and until I remove the enhancement (I do this build time with maven). First, for the test case I supplied: 1) You need

persist works though in a sample project, *after* the commit, my list property is correctly enhanced ... agent enhancer but maven compile time enhancer but the class itself is enhanced as I

; }     } } webel Dr Darren Kelly LAZY in JPA is a hint. If your code is enhanced (as ... _mapped:null a.listB_unmapped:[] If the code is not enhanced , ObjectDB has to keep a snapshot ... entity classes that are not enhanced . support Support Thanks for your explanation. I was able

. The problem arises when the ObjectDB Enhancer tries to weave some GWT class of wich some ... to ObjectDB. I don't even need LTW for ObjectDB because i enhance the classes at compile time. Any suggestions? Ralph mosi0815 Ralph Moser The ObjectDB Enhancer agent enhances only classes

, company); em.getTransaction().commit(); Thanks very much, Phil obiphil Philip Clapham Do you use enhanced classes? Merging non dirty objects is expected to be more efficient when classes are enhanced ... ://www.objectdb.com/java/jpa/tool/ enhancer #Load_Time_Java_Agent_ Enhancement _ This improved performance by

" directory still gets created.  A "log" directory also gets created when I run com.objectdb. Enhancer ... also prevent the "log" directory created when running the enhancer (java ... com.objectdb. Enhancer

you when running the test. Assuming you used enhanced classes (as mentioned in your test comments ... classes are enhanced ). Still it is not released on GC because this is the way soft references work ... this ObjectDb.conf setting: The test is using enhanced classes and inspecting RAM is done after commits

- it seems that there was a bug in lazy loading of instances of non enhanced classes. Please try build 09 that should fix this issue. In addition, you might want to enhance your entity classes ... )] if the classes are not enhanced . I am using objectdb-2.0-RC4_04. FredrikB Fredrik Bökman You are right

out the com.objectdb. Enhancer . Is this optional when deploying with eclipse instead of maven? I think ... it would be more appropriate to post here). siegfried siegfried heintze Enhancement  (using com.objectdb. Enhancer or

.o.CFG. (CFG.java:59) at com.objectdb.o.JEN. (JEN.java:59) at com.objectdb. Enhancer . enhance ( Enhancer

David Moshal Try rebuild and enhance of all your classes, as the error messages indicates a broken enhancement (e.g. some classes in a class hierarchy are enhanced some are not, which is not allowed). support Support

. While writing it i found out that it only happens whén I use the enhancer at compile time. I ... with a customized build.xml to enhance the classes. If you run the project you'll see the output "null ... : no need to wrap a single class test in a project even if enhancement is required, posting it as embedded

when run in Eclipse 3.5 in XP. [ObjectDB 2.2.9_03 Enhancer ] 5 persistable types have been enhanced ... ;   image.Thumb     image.URI 7 NON persistable types have been enhanced

(and enhancement ) it persists 340,000 objects per second". Insertion Speed Rate and Batch Load Now, ten years ... . gzdillon Lai Yang It seems that your classes were not enhanced (the huge difference when calling clear is a known indication). Unfortunately enabling enhancement using agent="true" is not

of the hint. This happens, for example, when ObjectDB uses reflection mode (classes are not enhanced ... are enhanced because of your implementation of the  setLocationList method, which iterates ... = locationList; } and enhance the classes - the test will throw NullPointerException as expected

and do enhance them at runtime, not compile time.. ?   Alex quasado Alexander Adam Multiple processes ... during enhancement , so the enhancement has to be performed before deployment (at compile time). This works

ObjectDB enhanced classes fail when compiled to Java 1.7 [ObjectDB 2.2.9_08 Enhancer ] 28 persistable types have been enhanced : ... com.vaisala.jx.db.gdm.model.SourceType stack trace from jUnit test com.vaisala.jx.db.gdm.facade.BaseFacadeTest  Time elapsed: 0 sec 

It may indicate partial enhancement . As you use enhanced classes, make sure that all persistable classes are enhanced as well as other classes that access directly persistent fields of persistable classes. support Support

and ManyToOne relationships only in enhanced classes. If you run your test as recommended with enhancement ... enhanced , ObjectDB has to ignore lazy loading and load "to-one" relationships eagerly, since  

prolancer Emil Andonov Enhanced classes have __odbHidden methods added by the Enhancer ... enhancer does not show the _odbHidden fields. Emil prolancer Emil Andonov

(ReadWorkoutPlan.java:36) This is how the error looks like if I enhance the classes before execution with: Enhancer . enhance ("xxx.xxx.entity.p2.*"); com.objectdb.o.InternalException: null at com.objectdb.o

and how to resolve it.   Manoj Manoj Kumar Maharana This exception may indicate partial enhancement . Please try a rebuild of the entire project with either no enhancement at all or enhancement of all the entity classes. support Support

IO request.  Nice! CBE CBE Was ObjectDB version 2.6.9_01 intended to have the enhancement ... blocking protection when again tried to use 256 KB page size.)  Perhaps the enhancement ... Support I ask that you do consider an exception as a future enhancement .  Without it, a user

. It required vendors to enhance the bytecode of domain objects to produce class files that were binary ... and that its reliance on bytecode enhancement caused it to be unfairly stigmatized. This was probably true ... community that now thinks nothing of using frameworks that make extensive use of bytecode enhancement

activation", boolean.class).getSingleResult(); everything is enhanced , 100 million objects, working fine ... computers, where the classes are enhanced but the activation code is either not available or does ... themselves (for example, during the build process or at runtime). Classes that are OEM- enhanced implement

computers,) as long as your development / build machine is activated and the classes are enhanced ... , only development machines require activation. Classes that are enhanced on an activated computer ... that is used for class enhancement ) requires a separate activation. Use your license to activate

is becoming invalid, I have do repeat this procedure to continue working. Enhancing is implemented in our gradle build ... reply. We are currently using '2.8.7_04' Are there any changes regarding the enhancement process ... for a more stable MAC address. The enhancement process and the validation have not been changed

.Field_1 using enhanced method (error 613) at com.objectdb.jpa.EMImpl.commit(EMImpl.java:289 ... .UserException: Failed to get reference value of field field DClass.Field_1 using enhanced method at com ... to get reference value of field field DClass.Field_1 using enhanced method at com.objectdb.o.MSG.a(MSG

well with no memory leak when the entity class is enhanced (e.g. running with -javaagent:C:\objectdb\bin ... but there is a problem. Indeed, my beans are not correctly Enhanced , reason is my beans are created by ... proxy with my entities beans. My conclusion is that the Enhancer is not able to process correctly

, see this forum thread . Enhancing the classes during build should solve this JBoss / ObjectDB runtime enhancement conflict. support Support Thank you for the reply. The test worked exactly as expected ("B#1" as an output). after enhancing the classes before starting the server the problem stopped :) I

.objectdb. Enhancer ; public class ODBTest { public static void main(String[] args) {     Enhancer . enhance ("failing.*");       EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence

value of field field org.sportscoring.ssv.xc.core.XCCompetitorCount.externalSyncID using enhanced ... .xc.core.XCCompetitorCount.externalSyncID using enhanced method at com.objectdb.o.MSG.d(MSG.java:74

, for example, maybe it affected enhancement by other JPA providers that you use and the class files have been enhanced in a way that causes the issue with ObjectDB. support Support

by JRebel and runtime enhanced by the Enhancer (exception was thrown by ObjectDB since the class wasn't enhanced and then the application enhanced the class). The operation was retried. I don't

to disable " enhancement ... is old" checks. Fixed a bug in handling remove and persist of the same ... PersistenceManager . Fixed an " Enhancement ... is old" bug on overriding persistent properties ... a specific enum type). Fixed a critical   " Enhancement ... is old" bug when using property access mode

? Are all your classes enhanced (or not enhanced at all)? Unsupported partial enhancement (e.g. an entity class is enhanced but is super class is not) may cause issues. Check if you still see the error

@server [2016-07-13 22:58:15 #2 type] Type com.gsi.sync.Connection.OperationData is not enhanced . [2016-07-13 22:58:16 #3 type] Type com.gsi.sync.FileInfo is not enhanced . [2016-07-13 22:58:17 #4 type] Type com.gsi.sync.FileInfoZip is not enhanced . [2016-07-13 22:58:17 #5 type] Type com.gsi.sync

and db files ( transaction is rolled back )   The packages were all enhanced ( static weaving ... java.util.Map z_registers  = new java.util.HashMap (); As before Enhancer is being run on code ... John Francis We have spent some time tracking this down. If we do not do static enhancing we do not

BTC EmbeddedSystems Do you use enhanced classes? If not, could you please run again with enhanced classes? support Support Just we have tested by usage of enhanced classes. But the result

that all your classes are enhanced . The screenshot indicates using some entity objects ( MappingImpl ... Support Thank you very much for your hint. If we enhance all entities then it works. btc_es BTC ... to entities although it is not needed. We did following: All entities are enhanced . The entity

objectdb.jar into your local repository). kaosko Kalle Korhonen It seems as a bug in using non enhanced ... .8_01 that should fix it. If it doesn't work try using enhanced classes (you should use enhanced

) in queries. Added type information to enhancement exceptions. Improved support of non standard ... . ( issue #415 ). Fixed a JMX Remote - ObjectDB Enhancer Agent conflict . Fixed a ClassCastException ... ; NullPointerException bug in query execution. Fixed a bug in using non managed non enhanced entity

Hello, we get an exception if we use Enhanced Entities. With not enhanced Entities we get no error. [ObjectDB 2.6.0_04] Unexpected exception (Error 990) Generated by Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.7.0_71 (on Windows 7 6.1). Please report this error on http://www.objectdb.com/database/issue