ObjectDB Database Search

Hi, I know that this has been asked, but the last time seems to be two years ago, so I'd like to know whether there is a change or an outlook regarding the topic: Is it possible, or planned, to run ObjectDB purely in-memory, without a any file on disk? Note that "file on RAM disk

;  calendar.set(Calendar. YEAR , 1970);         calendar.set

(Calendar. YEAR , 1970);         calendar.set(Calendar.MONTH, Calendar

datastore i.e. about 600ms rather than 3 seconds (on a 4 years old i3 based computer). We also tried

incremental backup later this year . support Support Great news. Does this plan also include

both plugins are identical. I checked all of this with a debugger.   We had a similar issue last year 2015

. There is no open issue in ObjectDB (and there was none in the last years ) that may cause this issue

to the new public method." At one stage, some years ago when I was using EclipseLink, I was using

years ago because of some issue which I believe may have been related to my use of groovy instead

requests and currently costs £2,400/ year . support Support

After years of evaluation and development using objectdb, we are finally about to release a product.  There have been bugs to deal with, but we have stayed with objectdb because it is as fast as it promises, and the support when we have had problems has been first class.  Thanks

, With all respect, the explorer app is really bad. When I ordered objectdb about four years ago

The recommended version is 2.8.4. Version 2.6.1 is 5 years old, and many improvements as well as bug fixes

;for one month, then the servers will be recycled. After half a year , we need to use the license

You provided the "InsertTest" in the following post, and say "On Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (and enhancement) it persists 340,000 objects per second". Insertion Speed Rate and Batch Load Now, ten years later, I run it on Intel Core i5-5300U (2.3Ghz) with 8GB memory, output is 45000 per second

they are, since the update of that version was from last year .  How do I find out exact I'm running

some years ago there was a chat around query hints http://www.objectdb.com/issue/2417 we are currently trying that with the latest version but we do not see that our hint is used this is the query: SELECT DISTINCT o from ObjectNode o join o.properties p1 join o.properties p2 join o.properties p3

several critical bugs that may cause various unexpected states have been fixed in the recent years

? support Support it does not happen with 2.7 (it was working for years ) 2.8.9 not checked

is more than two years old.     support Support This report seems to be related to issue

. A similar issue was fixed a few years ago and since then this is the first report. First, please check

for this case? btc_es BTC EmbeddedSystems Hello, the BUG status is active since one year . But its not

worked fine (and have for years before) with ObjectDB with objectdb-2.6.3_04. You now say

. This is probably the most critical bug in ObjectDB in the recent years . Thank you very much for your report and for your help in reproducing the situation. support Support

an IoT device.  It has to be able to run for months if not years without maintenance. I hope

would not need a change of the data model Yes, that makes sense. We will send you an invoice for one year

the problem. Note, however, that many issues have been fixed since version 2.6.3 (which is more than 3 years

(e.g. from a year or two ago) with which the memory is released in this specific case? support

Hello, I would have commented in this Thread but somehow I wasn't able to. Now again 2 years later and objectdb still does not support LocalDate? com.objectdb.o._RollbackException: Failed to commit transaction: Attempt to store an instance of a non persistable type java.time.LocalDate or am I

the objectdb.jar file. When ObjectDB 2.0 was released many years ago, one appealing point