53 | The drop code word does not work?Using ObjectDB in embedded mode, I tried the following while test running: EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("objectdb:punkter.odb;drop"); The drop-codeword does not seem to work - I must manually delete the database file each time. I get no errors |
53 | Git seems not to commit objectdb.confgit version 1.8.4.1 (Mac OS X) For some reason my Git seems to be "ignoring" (although not in .gitignore) the web/WEB-INF/objectdb.conf in a web app. I can't find anything about the .conf suffix being ignored. Has anybody noticed this and/or found a solution ? webel Dr Darren Kelly |
53 | Field in Generic Class not persisted?Hi, I am trying to persist a class which is extended from an generic class - but fields declared inside the generic class are not persisted - is that expected? I assume it can be done b/c this field can be recovered after serialisation/deserialization. Here is an code to demonstrate the problem |
53 | @Unique member combination not workingWhy does the below code not enforce unique restrictions? Person @Entity @Unique(members = {"name", "surname"}) public class Person implements Serializable { @Id @GeneratedValue private Integer id; private String name; private String surname; public Integer |
53 | _PersistenceException: Type is not found on getSingleResult.._PersistenceException: Type Estudiante is not found For this query: select est from Estudiante est |
53 | can not use spring-data-jpa repository with NamedQuery: Unsupported feature - Typed Parameters are not supported yet at com.objectdb.o.JPE.g(JPE.java:121) at com |
53 | JPA does not seem to be db agnosticThe following jpa code works with mysql but not with objectdb. Why would this happen? The provider the both jpas is the same: EclipseLink. The link for the one used with mysql is org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider; the one for objectdb is com.objectdb.jpa.Provider (per the tutorials |
10 | Can not connect to replication node when the objectdb.jar file is not available in the classpath. support Support Thanks |
10 | Mapped by fields are not initialized by JOIN FETCH in queriesAs demonstrated in this forum thread, a mapped by collection field with lazy fetch mode is not initialized in results of a query that uses JOIN FETCH on that collection field (when enhancement is used). support Support Build 2.4.1_06 fixes this issue (fields are now initialized and the test in |
10 | Feature Request: Subclassed PersistenceException for Type Not Found in DB Schema is not found com.objectdb.o._PersistenceException:45 com.objectdb.o.JPE:145 com.objectdb.o.ERR:56 com |
