ObjectDB Database Search

). The direct reference was added in version 2.6.2 in order to prevent garbage collecting ... to A . Will it help if we add an option to use ObjectDB in a mode of pre 2.6.2 version , i.e

downloaded the lastest version ,so I can create database and paste\cut\del with the popmenu ... future versions of the Explorer. Meanwhile, you should start by creating an initial database

only online on ObjectDB website. Hopefully, a PDF version of the manual will be available later this month. support Support A first version of the manual in PDF format is ready now and attached

other language letters. Future versions of ObjectDB should support also other ordering methods. As ... ; anaq x It seems that Java standard methods are not supported by the current version

of a super class is used by the query program. Version 2.2.9 fixes this bug. Thank you for this report ... an improved fix. support Support Looks like this version works. Thanks, Eitan eitane Eitan Eibschutz

We are working with objectDB version 2.5.5.b01. (we also tried to use the latest version 2.6.1) We have several issues with queries that can be seen with the attached database and using ObjectDB explorer: 1.       Using ObjectDB explorer a.    

Hi, I use windows 7 64 bit version . When I'm trying to open the ObjectdB explorer I get this windows error: "Failed to find Java VM".   What is the problem? dreckguy Ophir Haramaty Have you tried both explorer.exe and explorer-b.exe ? Can you write it from the console : java -jar explorer.jar

ObjectDB versions . support Support After some experimentation and looking at Andreas Beckers' iAuthor

from within NetBeans - version 7.0 beta (or above) is required. A WAR file that contains the Java EE

you for the update. support Support Hi. I am using Objectdb version 2.3.7_01. I am developing a test program

, even when it does not create output.  I must tell my version control system and product

=. Build 2.4.7_17 fixes this behavior. support Support Thanks for the quick fix. This new version 2.4.7_17 fixes this issue. pezifromvienna Peter Sauer

Hi, I tested ObjectDB embedded and it is really fast! Everything worked out of the box. Maven:    com.objectdb    objectdb    2.4.3   Persistence.xml com.objectdb.jpa.Provider   My goal now is to realize same thing using a client version . I started

. support Support The "dummy" parameter works with my version (2.2.5_04) - thanks! kborkowski Karol Borkowski

. But this may be supported in future versions and you may fill a feature request if you are interested in such a feature. support Support

, but we prefer to avoid introducing our own API, so possibly this can be achieved if a future version

Support First few tests shows, that new version works great (2sec queries now run in about 90ms). I

inheritance from other virtual users (in addition to $default ) in next versions - will this help

thanks for your help this is a little version of my real test, which uses a service layer

, I doubt that a specific test will be able to expose the issue.   Thanks   ObjectDB Version

Hi, one of my DB files can not be open by neither DB explorer, nor the DB Doctor. Both are writing same mistake : ObjectDB Doctor [ version 2.5.6_05] Copyright (c) 2014, ObjectDB Software. All rights reserved. ------------------------- No errors have been found ------------------------- com

. It is possible that this is some sort of a locking issue. Notice that disabling version check

version of the Person class, in which the contracts fields was not initialized). More information

to browse the API - notice that a version is specified for each interface, method

. Could you please help me to understand what is wrong with that ? Attached the two odb file for version 1 and 2. ps. I

@Index / @Unique annotations (hopefully in next versions ) - you will have to use JDO @Index

versions . support Support Thanks for the explanation. I will do some more tests on this. lwalkowski Lukasz

Hi, In version 2.4.2, when an object in a list is reversed mapped to the owning object, queries are returning objects of types that were not specified in the query. In the attached example the last test fails because the query returns both TeamA and TeamB objects where only TeamA was specified in

match between the two Resultlists Tested with   Version 2.6.7 and 2.4.5  - same behaviour

is accessed, all the PicData objects are loaded. This exact behaviour may be changed in future versions

there is no assertion error. I have tested the example with several objectdb versions (2.5.4, 2.5.6_05 and 2.5.7

git version 1.8.4.1 (Mac OS X) For some reason my Git seems to be "ignoring" (although not in .gitignore) the web/WEB-INF/objectdb.conf in a web app. I can't find anything about the .conf suffix being ignored. Has anybody noticed this and/or found a solution ? webel Dr Darren Kelly

2.2.8_01. support Support New version works fine. Thanks for a fix. lwalkowski Lukasz Walkowski

. To use the @Index annotation, I had to add a dependency to the JDO API version 3.1 (old link: https ... versions of ObjectDB, but not immediately, to avoid difficulties for existing users and projects. Assuming

Is there any further info on this request? I for one would love to see a .NET version of objectdb! felixobjectdb Richard Szurgot Sorry, no news yet. Working on the .NET version has been temporarily 

On upgrading to the latest version of objectdb I get the following exception on object retrieval: rbccm.felix.framework.ApplicationException: Error taking message from ObjectDB queue at rbccm.felix.objectdb.messaging.ObjectDbMessagePipe.take(Unknown Source) at rbccm.felix.objectdb.messaging

, which may be much more effective than splitting to multiple disks. Future versions of ObjectDB may support also splitting a database to multiple files. support Support

We would like to add to records start and end timestamp fields. When end field is null, it indicates the last version of this item. Few questions: in terms of performance, what would be faster, having a single timestamp and looking for the top1 when ordered by time or the above solution, looking

(); The last command will work when ObjectDB can find managed classes automatically . support Support Version 2.5.1 should fix this issue. support Support

versions in the client and the server. No other known reasons for this exception. Please try clean

Hi! when I run my application where 10 threads are concurrently accessing ObjectDB (only reading) via using ExecutorService, then these 2 mistakes are coming rapidly: 1. Caused by: com.objectdb.o._JdoObjectNotFoundException: Entity is not found: eu.extech.data. versioning .ProductVersionHistory#3669

For example, if we make a backup of our database it would be helpful to have the possibility to compare the backup schema (odb file) with the current version in the database and as result we should get the difference between the two schemas. It would also be sufficient, if we can compare object

Since Version 2.6.7_04 we get the following NullPointerException at Query execution: [ObjectDB 2.6.7_04] Unexpected exception (Error 990) Generated by Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.8.0_51 (on Windows 7 6.1). Please report this error on http://www.objectdb.com/database/issue/new com.objectdb.o

EmbeddedSystems We get he same exception (same stack trace) with the newer Version 2.6.1. btc_es

Support Thank you very much for the fast fix. We had directly used the new version . btc_es BTC EmbeddedSystems

Using version 2.7.4_01, we did a repair. After repair a former link to a missing reference was converted to null. This cannot be deleted using explorer   hgzwicker Hans-Georg Zwicker Thank you for this report. Build 2.7.4_02 fixes the issue. support Support

the problem. Note, however, that many issues have been fixed since version 2.6.3 (which is more than 3 years

. support Support Hello, I have tried version 2.6.0_04. The problem with the @OneToMany collection

please make sure that the server and client sides share the same ObjectDB version . support Support

on Windows 10 but the bug also exists in older versions . Thanks in advance Markus doppelrittberger